Farmed Fish Anyone?

An international team of researchers has found that about 50% of the fish consumed globally is farmed.
Here are some of the facts, and a discussion of the potential implications of the upward trend of aquaculture.
- Farmed fish is putting a significant strain on marine resources by consuming large amounts of feed made from wild fish harvested from the sea.
- Between 1995 and 2007, global production of farmed fish nearly tripled in volume. This is in no small part because of rising consumer demand for long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, said the researchers.
- To maximize growth and enhance flavor, aquaculture farms use large quantities of fishmeal and fish oil made from less valuable wild-caught species, including anchoveta and sardine.
- Aquaculture's share of global fishmeal and fish oil consumption more than doubled over the past decade to 68 percent and 88 percent, respectively.
- It can take up to 5 pounds of wild fish to produce 1 pound of salmon, according to lead author Rosamond L. Naylor of Stanford University.
Possible Solutions
- One way to make salmon farming more environmentally sustainable is to simply lower the amount of fish oil in the salmon's diet.
- According to the authors, a mere 4 percent reduction in fish oil would significantly reduce the amount of wild fish needed to produce 1 pound of salmon from 5 pounds, to just 3.9 pounds.
- Says Naylor, "Our thirst for long-chain omega-3 oils will continue to put a lot of strain on marine ecosystems, unless we develop commercially viable alternatives soon."
- Several fish-feed substitutes are currently being investigated, including protein made from grain and livestock byproducts, and long-chain omega-3 oils extracted from single-cell microorganisms and genetically modified land plants.
- There is a proposed National Offshore Aquaculture Act, which calls for reductions in the use of fishmeal and fish oil in feeds. Naylor applauds this proposal, and notes that California already has a sustainable oceans act.
- Naylor adds, "You won't prevent the collapse of anchoveta, sardine and other wild fisheries unless those fisheries are carefully regulated."
Source: Eureka Alerts
More like this in Food · Sep 10, 2009
Maybe I'm a bit slow - just how is it that we save wild fish by eating them?
ReplyI'm not sure I understand, if the masses started eating only wild fish, how exactly would that produce less of an impact? Now rather than harvesting feed fish to farm salmon, we're just harvesting wild salmon. I don't see how that's any better.
ReplyThat's kind of depressing: we'd rather keep destroying our oceans to get those obsessed over Omega-3s rather than changing corporate agricultural structure (raising of ruminants, etc.) and to please our little taste buds.
Reply"To maximize growth and enhance flavor, aquaculture farms use large quantities of fishmeal and fish oil made from less valuable wild-caught species, including anchoveta and sardine."
"It can take up to 5 pounds of wild fish to produce 1 pound of salmon .."
ReplyHumanity deserves to go extinct after we will destroy th oceans.
ReplyYou should read the book "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn.
Reply"The point remains that we are killing the earth along with ourselves and it is nearly too late to check our fate. This is reason enough for reading Ishmael" The Orlando Sentinal
Yup.
“When all the trees have been cut down, when all the animals have been hunted, when all the waters are polluted, when all the air is unsafe to breathe, only then will you discover you can’t eat money.”
Reply