The 5 Worst Fast Food Value Meals
It probably won't surprise readers to learn that the nutritional content of these cheap meals leaves much to be desired:
The Cancer Project found that most items advertised on Value Menus are high in fat, saturated fat, calories, sodium, and cholesterol. Many items also contain processed meats and grilled meats, which are linked to increased cancer risk.
- Cheap Eats for Hard Times: The Five Most Unhealthful Fast Food "Value Menu" Items
The five worst items came from five different chains, suggesting that all the big fast food names need to take a hard look at what they're pushing as their "Value Meals":
- Junior Bacon Cheeseburger (Jack in the Box)
- Cheesy Double Beef Burrito (Taco Bell)
- Breakfast Sausage Biscuit (Burger King)
- McDouble (McDonald's)
- Junior Bacon Cheeseburger (Wendy's)
- High fat content
- Grilled meat
- Processed meat
- Dairy products
- Fiber
- Sodium
- Fruit and vegetables
More like this in Fast Food · Jan 6, 2009
Junior Bacon Cheeseburger is my fav.
ReplyThe Cancer Project would not approve. Not for any rational scientific reason but because they are nothing more than a front group for a bunch of animal rights wackos known as PETA.
http://www.consumerfreedom.org/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/243
ReplyAnd so we should trust a center that is essentially a front for corporations that want us to have no knowledge with which to make an informed decision (genetic modification, product labeling, etc.)? Doesn't sound like a great plan.
ReplyAre you freaking kidding me? Go to the McDonald's website. Look on the bottom of the paper sack. All the nutritional information is there.
Corporations are only responding to market forces. They just want to make a profit. If the demand for the information is there then they'll gladly supply it.
PETA on the other hand has a warped socio-political agenda and they have demonstrated REPEATEDLY that they will LIE to convince people of their position.
Not to mention their truly sickening comparisons of eating meat to the Holocaust where six million Jewish people were murdered.
PETA is a demented, sick and twisted organization and people should know when they're being lied to by one of its front groups.
ReplyMarket forces are only effective when the human beings who comprise the market have enough information to make informed choices. As for them being against information, according to Wikipedia (I would check the CCF's website itself, but the page won't load at the moment), they are against mandatory warning labels. Given the sorry state of nutritional education in our country at the moment (no matter what your dietary stance), that translates to me as not wanting people to have information.
By the way, it would probably be interesting to compare the number of people who don't have internet or access in a public area to the number of people who eat at McDonald's. Last time I was in one, I don't recall seeing much nutritional information.
ReplyYour assertion that people don't have enough information to make informed choices is obviously and patently false.
Most fast food chains provide nutritional information in the store, on the packaging (usually the bottom of the bags) and on the internet. Then, you can call them on the phone and they will give you the information. Most will even mail it to you.
Then, if you cannot get the information because the company doesn't provide it you can NOT EAT THERE!!!
Wow, real shocking.
Perhaps a remedial course in economics is in order for you.
ReplyBy the way if you can substantiate your outlandish assertion that Consumer Freedom doesn't want consumers to have information to make choices, please go ahead.
ReplyI've checked out the website for consumer freedom, they definately mean freedom for corporations to push products without interference of watchdogs, health agencies, etc. Right wing front group for sure!
ReplyAnd? Still doesn't refute the fact that the Cancer Project is a front group for PETA and Ali didn't tell her readers that.
ReplyHi Booyeah,
I was not aware that The Cancer Project was linked to PETA, and I certainly didn't intend to push a biased line on Diet Blog. I found this information on the Consumer Freedom site: "The Cancer Project is led by Neal Barnard, a past president of The PETA Foundation. More than two-thirds of the Cancer Project's budget comes directly from the wealthy founder of the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida."
I agree that suggests a dodgy conflict of interest from Neal Barnard, but it doesn't suggest that The Cancer Project is purely a front for PETA.
Thanks for bringing this to the attention of Diet Blog's readers, though. This is a good example of why it's important that we all use our own judgement, rather than just leaping on the latest media advice!
Thanks again, and please let me state that I have no connection at all to PETA or to The Cancer Project. Large newspapers such as the New York Times also reported on this study, see http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/health/10meals.html
ReplySo how would a bag of unsalted nuts be rated according to this scale? They do contain some fiber, but I suspect this would not be enough to get them off the bad guys list. The total fat measure is virtually meaningless when one considers that this could equally means 10g of trans fat or 10g of omega 3.
ReplyIt doesn't matter because this scale and this so-called study are worthless.
They're just part of the PETA propaganda machine:
http://www.consumerfreedom.org/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/243
ReplyGet over yourself, this is the second exact same post on this thread. We get it, you don't like PETA! I don't like consumerfreedom
ReplyWhat I don't like are people pretending that studies like the one posted here are objective and meaningful when they come from the propaganda arm of PETA.
Otherwise, if Ali wants to be honest and open about her sources I am happy for her to post PETA garbage all day.
ReplyHi Booyeah,
Sorry if the source wasn't transparent. I did link to The Cancer Project's own pages, since they were the source of the study, but I was unaware of any connection they might have to PETA.
I originally came across the news item that pointed me to PETA's study at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/health/10meals.html
Thanks again for helping keep us Diet Bloggers on our toes. ;-)
Ali
ReplyI love when they make these lists always so intelligent let's look at the parameters for what's healthy or not:
* High fat content-Really, because if you read the best research(human based not animal as a example)it shows a negligible relationship between fat content and cancer or heart disease.
* Grilled meat- Ugh, just stop please.
* Processed meat-Yeah they've been trying to prove this one for a while but it just doesn't pan out under scrutiny.
* Dairy products-I don't know what all the confusion is over dairy too much media research and too little scientific research by people I suppose ,but milk(face it that's what they're referring to when they say dairy) is safe for people who don't have problems digesting it so back off.
* Fiber-You don't have to have fiber in your food for it to be healthy. Otherwise no meat would be considered healthy.
* Sodium-You need sodium especially if your active .The research tying it with heart disease is kind of sketchy, and to me borders activism more than unbiased research.
* Fruit and vegetables-So it needs fruit and vegetables to be healthy?
I think we can look at how they determine what is good for us ,and come to a easy conclusion that they're simply trying to sell people on a vegetarian based diet.While that may work for some people they don't exactly have good evidence to back it up over any other diet plan.
ReplyBingo. The Cancer Project is just a front group for PETA.
http://www.consumerfreedom.org/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/243
My guess is that "Ali Hale" knew damned well when she posted this drivel that it was part of PETA's attempt to mislead people.
If you look at Ms. Hale's posts she tends to prattle on endlessly about being a vegetarian.
ReplyI've never noticed Ali talk about being a vegetarian ,but I have noticed Gerry do that.Are you sure you have the right person?
ReplySorry if I prattle! I don't think I've ever advocated vegetarianism - I'm not a vegetarian and I eat meat most days. As Cereal says, maybe you've confused me with someone else?
Replywow, ok.
SATURATED fat, the kind found in red meat especially when it has been excessvely processed and had preservatives and additives mixed in, is PROVEN to be bad for your heart. Yes, a few fast food burgers will not lead to a heart attack, but so much fatty red meat can clog arteries and lead to a heart attack.
Grilled meat is fine, but it would be a hundred times better if it didn't have all that artificial crap added to it.
Dairy can have the same saturated fat if it is not lowfat milk, leading to the same heart problems
Fiber is necessary for digestion, increases the feeling of fullness so you aren't starving again an hour after eating a 600 calorie burger. Ideally, if you're going to have a burger as a meal, it would be good if it had at least 5+ grams of fiber.
Excessive sodium raises blood pressure, causing problems that can cause heart disease! Yes, sodium is necessary, but eating a day's worth in one meal is BAD FOR YOU unless you are EXTREMELY active, which most americans aren't.
Fruits and Vegetables have necessary vitamins and minerals, plus fiber, which as I mentioned we need.
As a whole, you need to look at a burger as a MEAL. as a meal, many are deficient in nutrients our bodies need, and eating one instead of a more balanced meal is not best because we then most likely do not get the nutrition we need each day.
ReplyThe occasional burger won't kill you, but too many could have serious consequences.
Saturated fat and sodium get way too much of a bad rep
,but in reality studies where participants are put on a diet conforming to a low sodium low fat heart association approved diet versus a group eating Ad libidium.Results show no significant difference in health between the two groups.
I would think this is a situation where moderation is key.I have no doubt that if you binged on any food you could make yourself sick.
ReplyShouldn't it be value menu items, not meals? I think meal and I think of the combo. Certainly, adding fries and a soda isn't going to make this anymore healthy, but it looks like they focus on the items. That Taco Bell burrito is a pretty new item, well done!
ReplyMore idiocy from Diet Blog.
Eating fast food does not harm your health. Eating fast food too frequently MAY harm your health.
What constitutes "frequently" is up for debate, and then of course there's the question of genetics.
Some people through the grace of God or the Devil have genetics that allow them to abuse their bodies and live long and disease free lives.
Please, quit pushing this idiotic propaganda that fast food in and of itself is bad for you. It isn't.
ReplyOh my god... STOP YOUR BI***ING you unflattering loonball. Seriously, there is no reason for you to spam this post with your shit. Want to make a point? Do it in one comment.
Yes PETA is a little messed up but seriously I think people can make their own informed decisions.
We don't need a lunatic saying the same shit over and over gain. You've continuously stated how you don't like Diet blog.
Yeah? LEAVE... and then listen. Listen to that sound. You hear it? It's the sound of NO ONE GIVING A SH*T.
You go Diet-Blog! Now.. let's get on with our lives. Good day!
- FJ
ReplyIt's a public forum and I will post as much and as often as I like.
Suck it up.
ReplyALSO, please be aware that DIET BLOG pushes far left pseudo-scientific propaganda under the guise of objective journalism.
The Cancer Project is an off-shoot of the crazed far-left nutjobs in PETA. People for the "Ethical" Treatment of Animals (and the total disregard for humanity).
http://www.consumerfreedom.org/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/243
ReplyI think it's DISGUSTING and SHOCKING that Diet Blog does not inform its readers of its source material's true associations.
Or did you just not do your homework?
Either way you're being INCREDIBLY IRRESPONSIBLE.
I have just lost a tremendous amount of respect for DIET BLOG.. not that I had much to start with.
ReplyThe more comments you leave in this post, the more attention Diet Blog gets. You're shooting yourself in the foot.
ReplyThat was pretty much my thought.
ReplyI want Diet Blog to get attention. That's the whole point. I'm not shooting myself in the foot at all. You're just an idiot.
ReplyExcept that you're the one who will look like he's an idiot, because you're the one who's throwing accusations and insults around everywhere.
ReplyI'm not throwing accusations around. It's a simple fact of the record that Ali Hale posted this "study" under the guise of objectivity and presented the information as objective, and totally failed to inform her readers of the benign sounding "Cancer Project"'s true associations and motives.
I honestly cannot believe you're trying to defend this absolutely disgusting abdication of journalistic duty; this complete and total abuse of power as a blogger on this website. It's sick, repulsive, and utterly irresponsible and it should make any honest person seeking real health information very angry.
Am I throwing insults? Absolutely. There are a lot of ignorant and dishonest people that post here and I'll continue to call them out on it.
ReplyPointless insults aside, web sites like this one make money through traffic. The more attention they get, the more traffic they get, the more money they make. Personally, I try to ensure products, companies, and forums I dislike make as little money as possible, but that's just me.
ReplyAnd? I'm not out to try and shut down Diet Blog or keep them from making a profit.
I'm a free market capitalist, in case you couldn't tell.
I am however out to expose Ali Hale as a fraud and a disseminator of propaganda.
ReplyI won't repeat myself here as I've hopefully said enough in response to your comments above ... but I'm truly sorry that my post came across to you that way. I don't intent to push any party line on Diet Blog, nor to ever publish anything under false pretenses.
ReplyWell Peta, Cancer whatever blah blah..... all I know is that ever since we started meddling with the food nature gave us humans have got ever fatter and unhealthier ever faster. So if you want to eat fast and processed foods schlurped down with a few sodas with all kinds of unnatural chemicals in them - that's your baby, it's your body. That's the beauty of free choice. You don't like the material Ali and Diet Blog put out, there are hundreds of others out there that might print more of what you like to read. Like I said, that's the beauty of choice.
ReplyNobody is complaining about the material per se. What I am complaining about is her failure to inform her readers of her source material's motives and associations.
If she wants to post up propaganda from a PETA front group, more power to her.
She ought to at least have the courage and the integrity to tell her readers what it really is instead of pretending that it's a legitimate, peer-reviewed scientific study.
ReplyWait, so are people commenting in this blog really arguing that fast food may actually be good for you.
Wow, should I be incredibly amused or extremely disgusted?
ReplyNobody has said anything like that. Of course you can show me where I'm wrong..
ReplyThis is yet another "I am a victim of food" post.
It's also another "I hate fast food restaurants" post.
Why the hate-mongering against fast food? If you don't want to eat fast food, then don't. And if you don't, then it's none of your business whether you think it has 2 more grams of fat than The Right Amount (as chosen by you, The Chooser).
Please mind your own business. Stop being a victim of food. And stop pedaling hate -- it's a lot more harmful than the food.
ReplyYou actually expect people to take responsibility for their own choices?
It is to laugh, sir. It is to laugh.
ReplyFirst of it is only 2 people who arguing in favor of fast food (Billy and Booyeah).
ReplyIt only took a few minutes to find out more about consumerfreedom.org.
Rick Berman is the President, Executive Director and Director of the Center for Consumer Freedom. He is a former restaurant industry executive who currently works as a lobbyist for the food, alcoholic beverage and tobacco industries.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Rick_Berman
Also read about their ties to a site "which purports to reveal a vast, left-wing financial conspiracy among major foundations and nonprofit public interest organizations."
http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2002Q1/ddam.html
Billy and Booyeah are tools for these organizations. Are you guys paid for your activities here? Or is this just part of your jobs other responsibilities?
ANY burger is bad for you IMO. Just the way a burger is made... the way it ends up in your stomach spells trouble.
Processed meats with processed cheese with condiments and top it off with white flour?
The-worst-food-combination-ever!
- FJ
ReplyThat's just a irrational fear.
ReplyYou're an idiot.
White flour and refined carbohydrates in and of themselves are not bad.
Even combining glucose and lard and eating that together is not in and of itself bad.
It's about quantity and frequency. You can have your cake and eat it too, so long as you don't eat it all the time and eat the whole damned thing.
Please, rent a brain.
ReplyLOLL!!
"Even combining glucose and lard and eating that together is not in and of itself bad."
And you call me an idiot? I'm surprised you have the testostorne in your overweight obese balls of lard to even achieve such a thing.
Listen... get off your fat ass and stop typing. Typing does NOT constitute as working out.
Just thought you should know.
-FJ
ReplyAnd??? Your point??
You've utterly failed to address the point in our posts. Ali Hale presents this "study" as some sort of objective scientific endeavor and totally fails to inform her readers of the agenda and associations of the so-called "Cancer Project".
That's incredibly irresponsible "journalism" if you can even call it that.
It SHOULD anger you. That it doesn't is telling.
ReplyI'm not arguing in favor of anything other than honesty and objectivity.
Ali Hale is a propaganda artist, and nothing more. She shamelessly puts forward this "study" by the benign sounding "Cancer Project" and doesn't bother to inform her readers of its true motives and associations.
Please though, define for us what "good for you" is. The body needs saturated fat. The body needs protein. The body needs omega-6 fatty acids. The body needs calories. By any objective measure, fast food can be (not IS but CAN BE) good for you.
If you're concerned about excessive saturated fat then don't eat fast food all the time and eat a reasonable serving. If you're concerned about Omega-6 to 3 ratio, take some fish oil.
About the only thing in fast food that your body has no use for is the carbohydrate. Even then, it's not "bad for you".
Can fast food be bad for you? Absolutely. Can it be good for you? Sure. All things in moderation.
Fish oil can be bad for you. Vitamins can be bad for you. Protein can be bad for you.
Virtually every aspect of all foods everywhere can be both good and bad for you depending on a variety of variables.
GET A BRAIN PEOPLE!!!!
ReplyI never eat fast food anyway, mostly because I can't stand how it tastes or how it makes me feel. I think this list could be a tad misleading though...some people may think "Oh, good, the Triple Stacker with bacon isn't on here; it must not be all that bad for me", when in reality it's not on there because it's not $1. I'm not going to get into the debate about whether or not fast food is/is not healthy because it contains grilled meat or cheese or whatever else. Fast food is unhealthy because it typically has lots of preservatives, it's not fresh, it often has trans fats and saturated fat, and it doesn't offer a lot of nutrition for how many calories it has. If you have $1, you're better off hitting up the grocery store and buying a yogurt and a piece of fruit or something like that.
Replyok, everyone needs to CHILL OUT.
The point is, that fast food in excess, especially certain items, is not beneficial for good health. I visit diet blog frequently, and though they do post about fast food sometimes, maybe once a week, they also post about other studies, foods, exercise, etc. I don't think they excessively bash fast food. But EVERYONE should know that eating a homemade meal can be cheap and is almost always more nutritious. It doesn't seem like diet blog is trying to shame those who eat fast food, more just make them aware of fast food facts.
As for the sources, maybe those who are intellectual can actually question the study if they are so interested in it and do research on the cancer project. Almost NO online sites list every possible fact about one source that they got, and I think it's slightly unreasonable to ask that. If you are so interested in the cancer project, do your research, make an opinion, and then either accept or reject the information that diet blog is giving as credible. but don't start some really lame online yelling argument posting the same link over and over (BILLY!!!)
ReplyChc your point about online sites not citing sources is my pet peeve. Getting on my soapbox here... stories or reports without citing the sources of second hand information is generally useless becuase one is depending on the reporter to evaluate the study properly (or maybe just giving another opinion).
Much better would be to link the word "study" with a source so readers can make up their own mind if it interest them. Thanks for bringing this up.
This is making me hungry - I think I'll go get a value burger now :)
ReplyI want to say that I agree that PETA is not a reputable source for any kind of diet info, but that these still aren't healthy value meals.
Also, I want to let you know that just because someone is a vegetarian doesn't associate them with PETA. I am a vegetarian, and I've always been careful to distance myself from those nuts.
ReplyWether or not you think PETA is corrupt or not, killing a cow for food when it is unnecessary for your survival, is detriment to your karma, not mine.
You wanna eat that burger, when there are veggie burgers available that don't cause suffering to a living being, go ahead! But if you do you might as well be eating your pet dog.
ReplyExcept that there are great differences between the energy provided by a veggie burger and an actual hamburger. If you're going to be a vegetarian, that's fine, but you can't pretend that these are the physical things going into your body.
ReplyHere are some related "Top 5 Lists" (including value menu items):
Replyhttp://www.fitnessforweightloss.com/weight-loss-top-fives/
Why is Carls jr. Big Hamburger not here on the worst of all. since there has already been a research based on this articles that they have the most high in carb, sodium and calories.
Reply