Body Electric: Workouts for Women
The cover of this book features a fit-looking, 40-something lady who looks like she takes fitness seriously and wants you to do the same. Start reading the book and you'll be amazed to find out she's actually in her 60's. Body Electric is a manual on how to beat the effects of father time with exercise. The sexagenarian I've alluded to is the long-standing host of the fitness show "Body Electric", Margaret Richard.
Here are my thoughts on her book.
Background
To begin, the book is formatted quite nicely and has a reader-friendliness to it that would appeal to even the most entry-level enthusiast.
She gives some tips to "fan the flames of motivation", including the suggestion of clear goals and a mission statement. The basic message is that you CAN do it - and it's never too late to start.
Richard gives the basics of exercise physiology including strength training, aerobic training, flexibility and posture.
She lays out some very good information about the benefits of exercise - particularly as it impacts menopause. Having been through this stage of life herself, Richard offers the facts and backs it up with her own experiences. She tells of her own weight gain and redistribution of fat despite her high level of activity and healthy diet. In this regard, she is advocating making the transition easier and not telling people you can train away all the menopausal effects.
There are excellent explanations on how building muscle leads to health benefits, specifically the benefits of building bone. There is an in-depth explanation on how to avert the effects of osteoporosis
The Exercises/Program
Basically, the program calls for high reps to "tone" muscles. Arrrggghhhh! (Sorry, I HATE that word - tone!). She recommends 3.5 minutes per exercise and includes exercises for all the major muscle groups. While it is difficult to prescribe sets and reps for the masses, I think this recommendation has two major flaws:
- It is limiting. You are focusing solely on the endurance of the muscles and not deriving the full benefit of weight training.
- There will be major discrepancies in level of difficulty. You can tweak this to an
- extent by varying angles/changing weights, but the fact remains that some of these exercises will be much easier than others to complete.
The exercises themselves are for the most part sound, but the pictures (as high quality as they are) don't always show good form. It is evident that Margaret is accustomed to doing this for television as she is looking at the camera in many of the shots. Now, it may be obvious to the more seasoned exerciser that you aren't supposed to tilt your head in one direction, but the beginner may not know this.
The warm-up exercises appear to be a combination of held and continuous motion stretches. The recent literature tells us that static stretching before working out isn't of much benefit and may decrease performance.
Overall Impression
I think it's a great book in terms of the information and how it is presented. I think this book would be well suited to those new to exercise and looking for sound education on the basics.
While the exercise section leaves something to be desired, I think that a newbie would derive some meaningful benefit from doing them - however limiting it may be. I also think an accompanying DVD of the exercises would be vastly beneficial.

Hey, someone else who shares my hate for "tone". :)
I go to Yahoo Ask to answer fitness questions occasionally, and so many people give answers like "do high reps, low weights to tone your body." It's not the word "tone" that bothers me, but the way people use it - high reps, low weights is training for endurance, which may or may not make you toned. Low body fat is probably what people mean when they say toned. :)
Lats! They are tied for my favorite muscle (next to traps). Mine are pretty small, so I keep trying to work them - wide-grip pullups are my favorite. I need a lot of assistance, but I've been getting gradually stronger.
And my god - she is in her 60's?!?! She definitely looks 40s to me.
ReplyI used to watch that show on TV. It was really useful because it showed three different levels of exertion and you could do whatever suited you at the time. I followed along for a summer and got into really, really great shape. I wish I could find it on DVD.
ReplyThanks for being so thorough about the book. It definitely let's me know if it's worth my time to read! Thanks.
ReplyWell, in my case I also go to the gym for yoga if I have time but sometimes I prefer to just stay home and just stretch (it’s also good) Well, I guess everybody here is a fitness buff, have you seen the Yoga v Western Stretch? if your going to choose between the ancient art of yoga, or traditional western-style stretching, which is which you prefer?
ReplyYoga v Western Stretch
Btw, here's the link of Yoga v Western Stretch
Replyhttp://clashorama.com/index.php?id=154
Just a quick note about the point about static stretching before a workout.
I the author of this article may have misinterpreted the research on static stretching prior to exercise decreasing performance.
Static stretching immediately prior to maximal strength training does decrease performance, but the key is word is maximal strength training.
Let's say that I can bench press 200 pounds for 1 repetition. If I static stretch my chest muscle immediately before attempting the bench press I will be weaker (let's just say 5% to give it a big number).
So in this example static stretching would mean that my maximum effort would be decreased by 10 pounds.
When dealing with submaximal efforts the effect on strength is much less, and after 2 minutes or so the relaxing effect of static stretching no longer impedes the ability to perform strength exercises.
Reply