7 Gym Exercises You Need to Avoid

by Mike Howard

For most of my adult life, I've held to the belief that there is no such thing as bad exercises - only bad ways to do good exercises. You can take the most effective exercises and make them useless and compromising just as you can turn an ineffective exercise into a safe and functional one. That said, some exercise machines and movements are just flat-out awful.

Here are the "Unlucky 7": exercises where the risks far outweigh the benefits.

  1. Inverted Leg Press: db inverted leg press.jpg

    The angle on most of these machines can cause injury due to the awkward position of the hips and spine. It is very difficult not to push the lower back into the backrest in this exercise. Doing so places stress on the disc when loaded. Additionally, straightening out the torso (as in a squat) gets full recruitment of the hamstring and butt muscles. The leg press keeps your upper body fixed, which takes this out.


  2. Better Alternative: Squats (barbell or dumbbell)

  3. Smith Machine: db smith machine.jpg

    Any way you slice it this machine (AKA "the expensive towel rack") is biomechanically horrendous. Like any other machine, you have to conform to a fixed movement - which doesn't take the lifters natural mechanics into consideration, and doesn't allow for subtle mechanical adjustments. This can cause problems in the knees and lower back if used to squat. Eric Cressey, who is the king of smith machine debunking, gives these 10 good uses for it (hint; none of them include squats or bench presses.


  4. Better Alternative: Any barbell or dumbbell alternative

  5. Back Extension: db hyperextension.jpg

    This machine promotes putting the back into a forced hyper-extended position. Combine the undesirable end position with the typical way in which people perform the movement (read fast and jerky) and you risk damaging joints in your spine (facet joints).


  6. Better alternative: On all fours - raising opposite arm/leg simultaneously (birddogs/pointing dogs).

  7. Ab Twist Machine: db ab twist.jpg
    Or any exercise whereby your lower
    body is fixed and your upper body is rotating against great force. The abdominal muscles are designed to prevent rotation, not encourage it. Further, your rotation is coming almost exclusively from the lumbar spine - an area that is prone to injury when placed in such a position.

  8. Better alternative: Short range twists with tubing or cable - allowing for some hip movement

  9. Upright Rows: db upright rows.jpg

    Due to the grip and the nature of the movement, upright rows place stress on the shoulder joint by causing a bone-on bone collision with every rep. Eventually, this may lead to rotator cuff tendonitis.


  10. Better Alternative: Lateral dumbbell raises

  11. Shoulder Press Machine: db shoulder press.jpg

    The positioning and the plane of movement of the arms when pushing above the head is highly individual. When your grip and movement are locked in one plane of movement, you may be asking for trouble over time. Having the arms too far in front of you or too far back can place stress on the shoulder joint.


  12. Better Alternative: Dumbbell shoulder presses

  13. Sit Ups (especially on a ball): db ball sit ups.jpg

    Again, the architecture of the big abdominal muscles dictate that it is not meant for big movements as in a full sit-up on the ball. Further, sit-ups promote an often undesirable flexion of the back (rounding). In fact the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends a limit of 3400 newtons of force to keep the back safe. Sit-ups contribute 3413 newtons.


  14. Better alternative: Short range crunch, tabletops, prayers.

So while we need to take individual training factors such as; ability, goals and experience into consideration when determining the value of an exercise, I don't think there is much place for any of the above.

More like this in Exercise · Jun 2, 2008

81 Comments

Anne on 06/02/08

Can anyone describe the "tabletop" and "prayer" exercise names as better alternatives for sit-ups? I'm always looking for a better ab exercise.

Thanks!

Reply
Mike H. on 06/02/08

Hi Anne,

I'll see if I can get some pictures up! The tabletop is simply positioning yourself on your forearms and toes and holding the position while keeping all abdominal muscles fired up.

Reply
Joanne on 06/03/08

Mike

I think the tabletop is better known as 'the plank'.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Yes! I should have clarified this - thanks!

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Anne - look for a follow-up post shortly with pictures and descriptions.

Reply
Rosemary on 06/03/08

There is a very effective pilates move which I'm going to try and describe, but you may need the author to confirm if its safe:

Lie on your back, in a "sitting" position. i.e. lift your legs at a ninety degree angle to your back and bend your knees to a 90 degree angle to your thighs. Cross your ankles.
Lift your upper back and shoulders very slightly off the ground.
Stretch your arms out along your body, and wave them up and down.
If you're doing it right you'll feel the stretch on your abs.

Reply
b on 06/02/08

Question about upright rows: Is the same movement OK with a separate dumbbell in each hand, so that the hands can move apart as you bring them up? I'm not sure if that's what's meant by "lateral dumbbell raises".

Reply
Mike H. on 06/02/08

It would be safer as you are able to manipulate the grip. It may feel a tad awkward, but try bringing the arms up with the thumbs pointed slightly upward. This reduces the bone-on-bone collision seen with a thumbs down-while-lifting-above-shoulder-level type movement.

A lateral raise is different as the arms are outstretched on either side (a "T" position). Bring the arms up only to shoulder level and with palms down or thumbs up.

Reply
Kenneth on 06/03/08

I have opted to do the upright rows instead of lateral raises due to an injury I got from the raises, so it seems odd that you deem the rows less safe. If I am using a bar that allows a grip at a 45 deg angle is that safer?

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Yes - that is another good option. Anything that helps angle the thumbs downward will help. Do what works for you. Let me know how it goes.

Reply
SCal on 06/02/08

That is a glute/hamstring machine and it is awesome.

The alternative is stiff leg deadlifts and good mornings.

Reply
Spectra on 06/02/08

I've always preferred free weights to machines, mostly because the free weights are cheaper and I don't have room for all those machines in my home gym. I used to like the Smith machine because it held the barbell steady so I wasn't afraid of dropping it or anything, but I actually found that I got better results by holding dumbbells by my shoulders and doing squats that way.

I always thought doing crunches on the ball were GOOD because they utilized a greater range of motion than the floor crunches. So is it only sit ups on the ball that are bad, or are crunches on the ball just as bad?

Reply
Quito on 06/02/08

Like Spectra, I concentrate using free weights.

I've had more than one instructor have me do crunches on a ball. i find them nice in isolating the abs from the hip flexors (mine are currently pretty tight).

Reply
Mike H. on 06/02/08

Yeah, I'm guilty of having put many a client through ball curl-ups. My rationale was the same in that it allowed for a greater range of motion. The more I learned about anatomy, the more I realized that the abdominal muscles were not meant for such large ranges of motion (I credit Dr. Stuart McGill for this realization). Although the rectus abdominis is a large muscle, it is separated by lateral tendons - rendering it more of a stabilizer. It is meant to produce greater power in short ranges of motion.

The other issue of full curl-ups is the extreme flexion of the back.

Studies are inconclusive regarding activation of the core muscles on a stability ball. One study showed greater activiation (21%) while other studies haven't shown much difference. There is reason to belive that increasing stability will also increase spine load, but this doesn't appear to have been studied much.

I think it's alright to perform some exercises on the stability ball, but I would be careful about replacing all of your bench/floor work with the ball.

Reply
Quito on 06/02/08
I think it's alright to perform some exercises on the stability ball, but I would be careful about replacing all of your bench/floor work with the ball.
Amen! My current instructor is careful about the range of motion on the ball, and i do them only every other week (I also do hip ups, captain's chair, bicycle abs, and bridge).

I do use the back extension, but with great care to avoid hyperextension. It has helped me in inversions in yoga.

Reply
Spectra on 06/05/08

I used to use the back extension machine a lot, but I stopped using it when someone took it out of the gym. Then I started doing bird dogs and I actually got better results doing those, so that's what I started doing instead.

Reply
BobThePeeHole on 08/18/08

does doing work out planks make you shorter

Reply
Tom ( Curcumin Nutritional Supplement ) on 06/02/08

Thanks for posting this. I'm relatively new to weight training, and I am always trying to gain knowledge on the subject. I have waisted a great deal of time on useless exercises, and I have done some of these without knowing that they were harmful. I'm wondering the same as Spectra. I was always under the impression that ab exercises were good on the ball because of the greater range of motion. Are there good ab exercises for the ball?

Reply
Mike H. on 06/02/08

I like short range crunches on the ball - but I use them sparingly. Only move about 6-8" on each rep. Keep in a range that challenges the abdominal area the most.

I think the prayer exercise, the tabletops on the ball and jaknives are good ab exercises when proper form is used.

Reply
Emily on 06/02/08

Oh wow, this is the first I've heard this list -- I am guilty of doing many of those exercises! Amazing how misinformed we are. I am really glad I read this now before I threw out my back or something worse.

Reply
emiglia on 06/03/08

This is really helpful. I've noticed a lot of people at my gym using the equipment wrong. Honestly, It's a lot better just to go for a long walk than it is to injure yourself doing exercises you don't understand. One of the best decisions I ever made was to pay for an hour's worth of training at my gym so that I could learn to use the equipment correctly.

Reply
Em on 06/03/08

That's a bit frightening, actually - most of these exercises were required in gym class at my high school, so I figured they were safe. Guess I'll avoid those machines next time I'm at the gym. Thanks for posting this!

Reply
asithi on 06/19/08

If I do half of what I've learned from gym class in school, I would seriously injury myself as an adult. I doubt if my gym teachers were properly trained.

Reply
Ego on 06/03/08

I'm rather curious of your actual credentials or qualifications. Almost all of these machines can easily be used correctly and without putting any negative stress on your joints or tendons. Upright Rows and the Ab Twist Machine are about the only two on the list that should be 100% stayed away from.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Hi Ego,

To address your points;

"Almost all of these machines can easily be used correctly and without putting any negative stress on your joints or tendons."

It is POSSIBLE to do many of these exercises "correctly". Part of my rationale for these particular exercises is that most if not all of them are DIFFICULT if not IMPOSSIBLE to perform safely. Even if you performed say a smith machine squat without problem - sometime down the road you will likely experience a movement pattern overload and subsequent joing stress.

I'll get to the rest of concerns later as I have to run.

Thanks for your comments!

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

OK - looks like I have a minute or two so I'll try and make my point quickly.

Just checked out your site. What I've suggested doesn't seem to run counter to the cross fit philosophy.

I think the message here is that there is a safer/more effective way to accomplish what you are aiming for.

Perhaps let me know specifically what you disagree with and we can discuss?

In terms of my qualifications, I've been a personal trainer for about 12 years now. I have a diploma in kinesiology and exercise physiology. I am currently a BCRPA registered personal trainer (a provincially-run certification - one which requires 2 practical evaluations, assignments and a 3 hour exam. I am a trainer of fitness leaders through this organization. I have also taught the personal training modules including anatomy and physiology, exercise physiology and muscle physiology. I am also a continuing education provider.

I have held 2 ACE certifications, a coaching certification and a Fitness Planning Specialist
certification (they have all lapsed).

I've had the opportunity to attend many continuing education courses and workshops throughout the years and have learned from some amazing individuals such as;
Stuart McGill, Gray Cook, Tudor Bompa, Michael Boyle, Alex McKechnie, Paul Chek, Len Kravitz and other colleagues. In addition to this, I try and read as much as I can.

Oh, and I saw Tony Little in a restaurant once.

Now, this doesn't make me any more qualified than anyone here to formulate an opinion. Also, education and certification and other accreditation do not necessarily make one knowledgeable. The experience, the commitment to constant learning and the desire to help people succeed are more important than any level of education. Plus, I can't tell you how much I've learned from the people in the diet-blog community.

I'm sure you have a lot of great things to contribute - I hope you continue to offer your opinions.

Reply
Spectra on 06/05/08

Ha, you saw Tony Little? That's awesome. Did you go up to him and tell him that his Gazelle is a piece of crap? Actually, I don't think I'd have the cajones to do that, but it's so true. Gotta admire his enthusiasm though :)

Reply
Mike H. on 06/06/08

lol... ok, I made that one up. But even if I did, I don't think I'd have the stones to call his gazelle a piece of crap, lest Tony beat me senseless with his pony tail!

Reply
listerart on 06/03/08

I'm with Ego on this -- What are your credentials or qualifications, Mr. Mike Howard? I use most of those machines with great success. You have to listen to your body and not overdo it. Pay attention to your form and what part(s) of your body is actually doing the work in each rep. If you're paying attention and concentrating on doing the exercise correctly, you'll gain positive results safely. I'm speaking from experience here.

Reply
I K on 06/03/08

The internet is notorious for people posting "dogmas" on weight training and exercise that people end up taking way too seriously. There's a wrong way to do just about every exercise, and maybe that's what your article is getting at. But there is no exercise that you could do in moderate amounts and proper form that will hurt you. The body is excellent at adapting, but only when you do things in moderate amounts. Ever wonder why people who never exercise end up having the most joint problems as opposed to people who do a little bit of exercise (even if they do it wrong). Don't get me wrong, doing really heavy weights on the leg press too often will damage your cartilage. However, by sometimes adding in very low weight/high repetition exercises into your workouts, you'll build up your joints and avoid having knee or hip problems.

I hate preaching dogmas, but if I must do it once:
If you're lifting heavy to get big, throw in high repetition workouts (20 reps per set) once every two weeks to promote cartilage repair and growth. (If you want a good research paper on this, send me an e-mail and I'll send it to you)

I speak from my personal experience in weight lifting and education in anatomy, physiology, and science. I also take from the experience of people who trained me.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

I think you touch on some great points! I agree with you.

Reply
Maox on 06/23/08

Hi! I wouldn't mind reading that paper, actually, could you mail me a copy? I've recently started out weight training and try to read up on as much stuff as possible.

Thanks!

Reply
Maox on 06/25/08

Humm. My comment got displaced somehow. Oh well..

Reply
cari on 06/03/08

What do they say - you can't do a wrong thing right! And some of these machines are just downright awful.

Reply
Pain Medics on 06/03/08

Ok, so what else are the worst exercise machine? do you have more list rather than this?

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

I think avoiding any machine you can fall asleep on is a good idea! I think machines can have their place, but it should be a small place.

Reply
Steve on 06/03/08

Adding pic's or examples of the alternative suggestions would be helpful.

Reply
Jeff on 06/03/08

I didn't think that some of these would be bad. I do know that the smith machine is horrible, but the inverted leg press? or the upright row? Those two I am not sure of, but the rest I can agree with...maybe. But you are the expert, so I concede to your wisdom :)

Reply
tommy on 06/03/08

In my high school weight lifting class I started using the inverted leg press. I ended up using my lower back like he described in the article. I had to have back surgery at age 18 because I had a herniated disc that pinched off my sciatic nerve.

Reply
Ego on 06/03/08

Yes, that was due to incorrect form on the machine. Moving down past 90 degrees and therefore causing forced lumbar flexion. The problem isn't the machine it was with the person that instructed you in the use of the machine.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

I wouldn't be so hasty in discounting the machine as being a contributor. As I contended in the article, The machine makes it very difficult to maintain proper lumbar spine curves and completely eliminates trunk extention. You can easily go 90 degrees and beyond with a traditional squat whilst maintaining a neutral spine position. Disc herniation is virtually impossible to achieve without forced flexion which is VERY hard to withstand on this machine as the tendency is to push the lower back into the back rest.

Reply
Spectra on 06/05/08

I used to love the inverted leg press, but I found it was really hard to always keep good form and keep my back in the proper position. I stopped using it in favor of doing weighted squats and lunges and plyometrics because I actually got better results that way.

Reply
Quito on 06/05/08

The inverted leg press is one of the two exercises that did some damage to me - a small hernia. The other was the seated calf raise machine - which did serious damage to my Achilles tendon.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Hi Jeff!

I think it's important to rememeber that every body is different in terms of tolerance to certain stimuli. I would gather some other opinions, experiment and apply the information to your own personal situation.

All the best!

Reply
Jeff on 06/16/08

Thanks for the reply Mike.

I have been working on a couple of my own routines as I am trying to finally get rid of the gut, and so far I am doing good.

One thing that this article was good for, in my case anyway, was to help me look at what I was picking for my routine and really stick better to the free weights and then form. I talk to the PFC's at the gym whenever I am not sure if I have to form just right.


Reply
Ego on 06/03/08

I applaud your straight-forward approach and respectful approach to my post. I half expected a defensive and nearly offensive post so that is rather refreshing.

As far as my opinions on the matter. Like I said, the upright rows I completely agree on as they are, hands down, HORRIBLE for your shoulder girdle and rotator cuff. There is absolutely NO safe way to do them.

Back Extensions are great for your back, though. Remember I said done correctly. A back extension is merely that an extension NOT a hyper-extension as you mentioned.

Sit-ups are also great for working your entire abdominal complex while tying in your erectors and hip flexors into a completely functional movement which you do encounter often throughout the day. Unfortunately the alternatives you suggest will, often times, lead to even further injury through undertraining of many of the stabilizers in your back and abs and further inhibit an already large problem which you and I both see on a daily basis, which is people unable to perform simple daily activities due to atrophy and CNS disconnect.

I understand the underlying motivation of your post as it's EXTREMELY difficult to give fitness advice to the masses. I have rarely (if ever) seen someone come in with good form, muscle activation and the ability to coordinate it all into meaningful and functional movements.

In essence I will agree that many of these exercises performed incorrectly can and will cause long-term issues but the answer isn't avoidance, the answer is education. Nearly all of the exercises can be done in very positive ways that would influence your fitness in a very good way and offer many different courses of advancement.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

Ego,

It really is a great discussion - I appreciate the dialogue. I'll address a couple of issues you brought up.

"Back Extensions are great for your back, though. Remember I said done correctly. A back extension is merely that an extension NOT a hyper-extension as you mentioned."

I don't believe they are great for the back. Again, I can't make a sweeping claim for everybody all the time, but there are very good reasons not to do them and to do something else. Even when going to the anatomical end point, the back extension imposes over 4000 N's (about 1000lbs) of compression on the spine - far greater than what NIOSH has set as a safety threshold.

"Sit-ups are also great for working your entire abdominal complex while tying in your erectors and hip flexors into a completely functional movement which you do encounter often throughout the day."

Sit-ups do in fact work the 3 layers of abdominal muscles, however they are quite poor for recruiting the deeper TVA and the erector spinae (Jenker et. al 1998). As for crunches being completely functional, I disagree. There is very little carry-over into daily activity that I can think of.

"Unfortunately the alternatives you suggest will, often times, lead to even further injury through undertraining of many of the stabilizers in your back and abs and further inhibit an already large problem which you and I both see on a daily basis, which is people unable to perform simple daily activities due to atrophy and CNS disconnect."

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the prayer or the tabletop insufficiently activate the stabilizers? I am confident that they do - especially when trained how to properly recruit them. Additionally, you get less spine load than you would from a sit-up due to being able to keep in a neutral spine - the safest, most stable position of the spine. Because of the design of the rectus abdominis, it is not meant to create force over a large range of motion.

I agree with you that education is the most important piece of all of this. I do, however stand firm that certain exercises are best to be avoided - especially when there are better alternatives.

Again, thanks for the great discussion.

Reply
Spectra on 06/05/08

Hey Mike, what do you think about wood chopping? I help my husband split wood with an 8 lb sledgehammer and a wedge and when there isn't any to split, I take an 8 lb weight and do the motion without the wood. It seems to really work a LOT of my core muscles because I have to control the hammer with most of my body. My husband swears by splitting wood to get his midsection toned up and I must say, I get pretty decent results from it as well.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/06/08

Hey Spectra,

I think the wood chopping movement is fantastic! As long as the form is sound, it makes for a formidable full-body exercise. I get people to think about the transfer throughout the movement. Think first about bracing through the core, then think about the force transfer moving from the 1 leg through the core/obliques and then shoulders. Keep the spine neutral throughout and keep the chest high.

Very resourceful of you!

Reply
Justin on 06/03/08

"may", "risk", "can cause"... you can say this about anything and any exercise, including the cherished barbell squat and deadlift.

So...not a very informative article, especially for those of us who have seen gains using some or all of the 7 exercises listed.

Justin

Reply
Mike H. on 06/03/08

On your first point - very true. I did mention this in the first sentence of my post.

I'm not denying that people can see positive results from doing these exercises. What I'm suggesting is that there is a cost-to-long-term-benefit ratio that needs to be considered. There are better options out there and I would be willing to bet that you would reap greater benefits while reducing the risks by substituting the exercises for alternatives.

I appreciate your input.

Reply
Supplements Canada on 06/03/08

While I think there is some cause for some of these exercises, I do think each one can provide certain benefits to certain people if done properly.

Reply
Rebecca on 06/04/08

And interesting article and discussion; thanks to all of the contributers.
I had a moment of hope when it seemed as though prayer might be good for your abs, but I suspect that it's just another exercise. I look forward to your post describing better alternatives.
And it does seem to me that one variable is whether you have someone instructing you in the use of the exercises and machines or not. A lot of us just stroll into the gym and try to guess how to use the equipment.

Reply
Miss M on 06/04/08

Thanks so much for writing and posting this! I have found that free weights give me more results than machines. However, I had no idea that some of these machines could be so dangerous. When I first started with weights, I was told to use machines because they would teach me proper form. I got bored with them because I wasn't seeing results. The "Body for Life" book is what got me using free weights, and I've been thrilled with the results.

Reply
DR on 06/04/08

Ego & Mike H

Great discussion. I just read the entire thread and for a while I was expecting a verbal fist fight complete with lots of @$#%&*@ and *&%$#$@!!.

Hopefully your back and forth made this subject more understandable to the newbies in the audience.

Reply
weight loss program on 06/05/08

I disagree with this post. Should these exercises be performed with correct technique they are actually very good exercises.

Reply
sir jorge on 06/05/08

Woa, this post is very timely, as i've been doing it all wrong for a long time.

Reply
Albert on 06/05/08

Hi Mike,

Are you a kinesiologst?

PS. Very concerned citizen.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/06/08

No, I am not.

Reply
Jason on 06/06/08

This is very good information! Machines with light to moderate weight are good for recovery, but that's about it.

I would recommend looking into exercises by Paul Chek. His training videos, website, books are great. Just get them at your library! I did, liked them so much, I purchased them.

He's done a lot of research into natural body movements, from Feldenkris (bad spelling?), eastern disciplines, etc. He is very focused on core work.

Reply
Jeff on 06/07/08

Wow, I didn't expect to see sit ups in this list. What about 'hanging sit ups' -- doing chinups and curling your legs up at the same time? It's a similar motion but approached quite differently.

Reply
Kailash on 06/07/08

Come onnnn... Calling for his credentials? That's just idiotic.

Mike should have said, up-front, that these exercise cause trouble if not done right or are done by people who have majority biomechanics. He goes on to say as much in many of the descriptions.

I totally agree with the Smith machine and upright rows, for instance. However, I've never experienced trouble, or the beginnings of trouble, with the leg press or back extensions.

There is a certain degree of "different strokes for different folks". And in weight lifting, folks can perform the exercises utilizing different strokes, which might cause them to be safer or more dangerous.

One exercise that I would add to the list are bench dips. That's sitting up-right, with feet on one bench and hands on the other, wrists extended and fingers pointing backwards, then lowering one's body toward the ground and back up again.

Inherently biomechanically dangerous to the shoulder, though I'm sure it works for some. Just... be careful.

Reply
Spectra on 06/08/08

Yeah, certain exercises should also probably be avoided if you are not close to your fitness goals because you can get really hurt. Case in point: My mom, who is around 70-80 lbs overweight, tried to do that exercise where you support your body weight on your arms on a set of parallel bars and slowly lower your body and back up again. Well, she couldn't support her weight and fell, bruising her chest really bad. So yeah, if you've never done a chinup or used a piece of equipment, don't try it out without a trainer there to spot you because you could seriously hurt yourself.

Reply
VegasDragon on 06/07/08

This is my first time posting. Kind of off topic, regarding Squatting. I've been steadily doing cardio for a couple of months, I.E. : 30 minutes on the Treadmill, 15 on the Stairmaster, and 15 on the Elliptical per day. I've lost a good amount of weight, upwards of 35 pounds or so.

Straight to the point. I just started squatting a couple of days ago. My legs are just peachy, but I half ass messed up my shoulder blade muscle yesterday. It feels fine today.

Well, my question is, where should the barbell be resting while I'm squatting? On my shoulder blades? Top of my neck?

Reply
VegasDragon on 06/07/08

I'm 6'3'' 225 pounds, if that helps answer my question.

Reply
JOhn on 06/08/08

VegasDragon,

For barbell back squatting, the bar should be resting below your neck, on the "meaty" part of your trapezius muscles. Do NOT rest the bar on your neck - there should be no tension on your neck during back squats.

John Sifferman NSCA-CPT

Reply
Abbey on 06/09/08

With the Ab twist machine, there are two versions of that machine. The other one is having your lower body move and your upper body stable. I've used both and I prefer the one I mentioned. Are they both wrong?

Reply
Mike H. on 06/15/08

Hi Abbey and sorry for the delayed response - hope you are still around!

It's a great question and I think they would both be potentially comprimising from a body mechanics standpoint. Again, you are isolating movement to an area that already inherently has too much movement (generally speaking). If you choose to use this machine, do not use too much weight and limit the range of motion. This way, you are keeping in a safe zone.

Reply
Abbey on 06/22/08

Okay, I will change it up a bit and see if it works. I had to track down the site again to read the post.

Reply
Personal Trainer on 06/14/08

The list is OK but needs to stress how the exercises it says to avoid are good for some people. There is NOTHING absolute about exercise, except for the fact you should be doing it.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/15/08

Very true! I did put that disclaimer in the first paragraph of the article, though. The point is that there are benefits to doing alternative exercises that are more effective and less risky. Would you agree?

Reply
Nathan on 06/15/08

I'm with abbey and would love an answer to that question. The gym I go to just replaced the old one that twisted at the top with a new that twists at the bottom.

Reply
6pack Abs on 06/15/08

This list sucks. YOU meaning me? You don't know me so your list has absolutely no meaning for me. I have performed the leg press machine for 20 years and I have never had an injury.

Sorry but the list is poppycock!

Reply
Certified Personal Trainer on 06/15/08

Although most of these arguments on the page have some flaws, the one that stood out to me enough to make me feel like I had to comment was the stability ball crunches.

The proper way to perform a stability ball crunch is to arch the back over the top of the ball so that the abdominals are stretched (with a greater stretch for those with more experience and vice versa). From the starting position, tucking in the chin, the back should slowly peel off of the ball starting with the neck and shoulders. Once the angle at the hips is about 135 degrees (DO NOT SIT ALL THE WAY UP), movement should stop and the back should be brought back down to the ball slowly to repeat. This movement is considered a full range of motion (ROM) for the abdominal muscles.

Sitting all the way up so that the torso is vertical is going past the ROM of the abdominals and starts to recruit the hip flexor muscles. If one wants to focus on the abdominal muscles, the end of the ROM should be before reaching vertical. If one wants to work both the abdominal and hip flexor muscles, they can do so safely by performing the exercise to vertical with slow and controlled movements, engaging the core muscles and not straining the neck or going so fast that they start to bounce on the ball.

Compared to a sit up on the floor the stability ball is far superior! Imagine performing a bicep curl starting with your forearm parallel to the floor- that is similar to a crunch on the floor. Because you are on the floor, your back cannot be slightly hyperextended, which disallows a full ROM for the abs.


Now, for people with lower back injuries, crunches in general might not be a good idea, but for a healthy person stability ball crunches are a wonder. Make sense? Maybe further research should be done on this and the other exercise before confusing the already confused public on exercise methods.

Reply
Mike H. on 06/15/08

sigh... please read the section in it's entirety before going on a biomechanics dissertation. Note I was talking about FULL SIT UPS ON THE BALL. The type of movement you described is indeed in line with my understanding of a more effective way to perform a curl-up. Note that I included partial range crunches as an alternative. These can be done on a ball or the floor.

Have you read the work of Stuart McGill? I highly recommend Ultimate Back Fitness and Performace. He explains these concepts as well as anyone I have ever seen.

Also, if you are going to scrutinize, be sure what you are saying is factual. There are holes in the theories you've presented. First off, you can hyperextend the back byond neutral to achieve the ROM you mentioned in a floor crunch. Simply bringing the spine from neutral range to flat is all the range you need - no stability ball necessary! I like to intersperse stability ball work, but I don't exclusively have clients on them, and I don't have them do full range curl-ups (as you mentioned).

Further, it's not about how much integration the hip flexors are getting but rather the full curl-ups promote an unimportant and potentially comprimising full flexion of the spine.

So yes you can get more ROM on the ball, but my contention is why would you want to, given the structure of these muscles.

What research would you suggest I undertake that counteracts what I have said? I think people are better off not performing the exercises I've mentioned in favour of the alternatives (soon to be published with pictures). If you have something compelling to convince me otherwise, I'm happy to hear you out.

Thanks for your comments.

Reply
Alex on 06/16/08

Oh my god. Thank you so much. Now I know why my shoulder hurts so much. I wish I hadn't done all that upright row stuff. DAMNIT!

Reply
Ben K. on 06/16/08

I'm going to have to disagree with the back extension machine being a risk to the facets. It is also a great machine for strengthening the "closed packed" position that protects the lumbar discs. I'd throw all the machines away but this one and maybe the Smith rack to hang towels. Also, the upright rows, done correctly are not bad for the shoulders. The picture drawn is actually pretty good.. elbows high. Good list otherwise .

Reply
Ben K. on 06/16/08

I thought I'd expound a little bit on the upright rows. Perhaps a sumo-deadlift with high pull would be more appropriate exercise as a compound movement. The bone on bone that you speak of in the upright row, I assume is the humerus bonking on the AC joint... well, that is where the scapulo-thoracic joint comes in to play. Lateral raises are a biomechanical nightmare for the shoulder... unless you like supraspinatus tendonitis. Too many lateral raises and you'll be in rehabbing a rotator cuff injury.
Have a nice day and good work with the blog.

Reply
Obsession Fitness on 06/27/08

The only one I might avoid completely is the ab twist. Otherwise all of these machines can be effective if used properly. It comes down to the user knowing his body and knowing how to perform the exercises.

Reply
Charles on 06/28/08

As a physical therapist and personal trainer, I can understand the arguments in the above article. But, I caution people to take a black and white approach to good and bad.

The two that I include in many programs are the back extension and sit ups on the ball.

There is a lot of research that shows that strengthening of the lower back muscles is an effective way to treat lower back pain and in many physical therapy clinics across the country the back extension machine is a staple in the rehab process.

And in regards to sit ups, they don't put as much stress on the lower back as running and jumping. So if you are an athlete who runs and jumps you should probably do sit ups to strengthen your core.

Now of course, if you have injuries any exercise can be bad for the injury and you should seek the advice of a health professional.

The body is complex and many studies are one dimensional, so keep looking at exercise from as many angles as possible.

http://www.ab-core-and-stomach-exercises.com

Reply
gayn on 07/04/08

lol hahaha ive been weeing and rubbing it over my face xxxxxxxxxxxx lololol :):) brap brap

Reply

Add Your Comment

Required (nicknames or firstnames only)
Required (never displayed)
Optional



Most comments displayed immediately - some are held for moderation. (How to get an avatar)

©2003-2008 Diet-Blog - All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer