Watch Those Plastic Bottles

Very recently Canada became the first country to ban baby bottles made with the chemical Bisphenol A (BPA). The substance is commonly found in bulletproof glass, computer cases, eyeglass lenses, CD's, but also finds its way into reusable water bottles, sippy cups and storage containers. The reason for precautionary ban is the possibility of BPA leaching out when plastics come in contact with food or water.
BPA is what's known as an estrogen hormone disrupter - meaning it activates the same receptors as estrogen does. The potential long-term consequences may be reproductive damage and an increased risk of prostate and breast cancer in adulthood.
If you are concerned about BPA migrating into your food and drink, here are some steps you can take to reduce your exposure:

- Avoid plastic containers made of polycarbonate. Look for the recycling number 7 on the bottom. (Not all No. 7's contain BPA).
- When possible, prepare or store food (especially hot foods and liquids) in glass, porcelain, or stainless steel dishes.
- If you have polycarbonate plastic food containers - don't microwave them. The plastic is more likely to release BPA when repeatedly heated at high temperatures.
- Don't wash polycarbonate plastic containers in the dishwasher. The detergent may break down the plastic, which could release BPA.
- Use infant formula bottles that are made of glass or BPA-free plastic (many companies make them).
- When possible, replace canned foods with foods that are fresh, frozen or packaged in shelf-stable boxes.
- A good alternative to polycarbonate is polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), which has the recycling number 1 on the bottom.
Is BPA exposure a major threat to our health? The answer is so far unclear - with 2 separate research panels reaching diametrically opposing conclusions. In my (completely devoid of expertise in the subject) opinion, it doesn't seem necessary to push the panic (at least not yet). That said, we can take relatively easy steps to minimize exposure just to be on the safe side. It would also be wise to make a more concerted effort to ensure our little ones aren't exposed.
Sources: U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
I've been hearing a lot about this. Mostly because my husband and I are TTC (trying to conceive), and one of the things the studies have found BPA "may" affect is fertility. Again, no evidence that it DOES, just that it might contribute.
I'm not going to panic either, just doing what I can to minimize my exposure.
ReplyThere is some data from animal models that BPA does affect fertility.
Leached components from dental composites and their effects on fertility of female mice.
Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Elbetieha AM
This study investigated the effects of leached components from a resin-based dental composite (Z-100) and bisphenol A (BPA) on female mouse fertility. Leached components or BPA (5, 25 and 100 microg kg(-1)) were administered intragastrically daily to the test and distilled water to the control groups for 28 d. Female mice were then mated with sexually mature untreated males and their fertility was assessed. The results revealed a significant reduction in the number of pregnancies--54.5% vs. 100% (control)--in mice treated with the leached components from the dental composite, which also showed an increase of 142% in relative ovary weights. Exposure to 25 and 100 microg kg(-1) BPA resulted in significant increases in the total number of resorptions out of the total number of implantations and significant increases in relative uterine weights. Relative ovarian weights were significantly increased at the highest dose. High performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that tri-(ethylene glycol)-dimethacrylate (TEG-DMA) was the major leached component (total: 5945 microg ml(-1)) from the composite, followed by bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate (BIS-GMA) (total: 2097 microg ml(-1)) and BPA (total: 78 microg ml(-1)). The results suggest that leached components from the dental composite used and commercially purchased BPA have adverse effects on the fertility and reproductive system of female mice.
------
In the US, our exposure isn't reported as problematic though from NHANES data....
Bisphenol A (BPA) daily intakes in the United States: Estimates from the 2003-2004 NHANES urinary BPA data.
Lakind JS, Naiman DQ.
Investigations into human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) have, for the most part, assessed intake based on food consumption estimates combined with measurements or estimates of BPA in foods. In this study, nationally representative data on urinary levels of BPA in the United States (US) from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to estimate daily intake of BPA, assuming steady-state excretion. Distributions of intakes for the US population were determined for (i) all NHANES participants with urinary BPA data; (ii) participants by the following age groups: 6-11 years, 12-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, and 60+ years; and (iii) participants by gender. On the basis of the NHANES urinary BPA data and the assumptions described in this paper, daily BPA intakes for male participants are statistically significantly higher than for female participants, and there are statistically significant differences in daily BPA intakes according to age groups, with the oldest group having the lowest estimated intakes. Median intake was approximately three orders of magnitude below health-based guidance values of 50 mug/kg-day.
------
Then again....
Xenoestrogens: the emerging story of bisphenol a.
Ben-Jonathan N, Steinmetz R.
Xenoestrogens are chemicals with diverse structure that mimic estrogen. Bisphenol A (BPA), a monomer of polycarbonate and epoxy resins, has been detected in canned food and human saliva. BPA stimulates cell proliferation and induces expression of estrogen-responsive genes in vitro, albeit with a relatively low potency. In vivo, BPA increases prolactin release and stimulates uterine, vaginal and mammary growth and differentiation. BPA shares similarities in structure, metabolism and action with diethylstilbestrol (DES), a known human teratogen and carcinogen. This review considers the hypothesis that BPA is converted in vivo to hydroxylated metabolite(s) with enhanced estrogenicity and genotoxicity.
---> the DES part is downright scary!
ReplyConsidering that Nalgene bottles (the ones that are polycarbonate) weren't even originally designed to be used as a drinking vessel (they were to be used in laboratories for various purposes and some smart-ass lab tech took them home to use as a water bottle and so the industry started), I think most people overreact to this. As long as you don't heat polycarbonate up too hot or freeze it with food/drink in it, you won't leech BPA into the contents, but if you're paranoid, drink out of a glass or get a metal, UNlined water bottle. Of course, then you have to worry about the aluminum in the water bottle causing Alzheimer's....I guess ya just can't win, right?
ReplyWhat Spectra said. Don't heat or freeze them. If you are still really concerned, they are switching to non-BPA... so make your next water bottle one of those. Hell, they are recyclable in most places and new ones are what, 10 bucks?
Personally I'm hanging onto mine until it's necessary for me to upgrade.
ReplyI was tired of all the talk about what could or could not be in plastic bottles, so I just bought a Sigg. I love the thing! It's aluminum and it's made in Switzerland and not China (which was also a big worry of mine with all the recalls and whatnot). I highly recommend Siggs in anyone else is worried about plastic bottles.
ReplyI remember when siggs were the only water bottle you could buy - god I'm old.
I wonder what the environmental fallout will be when everyone starts chucking all their plastic bottles out in a panic. As it is, the percentage that gets recycled is really low.
ReplyThere was a good article in the health section of yesterdays NY Times about BPA. Apparently most of our exposure to it is actually through the lining of CANNED foods. News to me (and I took a whole class in undergrad on hormones and behavior with a unit on BPA and phthalates!)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/health/22well.html?ex=1366603200&en=47072d3f8b3a9431&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
ReplyThe thing that gets me about this 'recent' study is that this has been known for a long time. A while back scientists switched to plastic test tubes only to find out that the cells that they were working on were multiplying. Why is this information only coming out now? http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/Plastics&BreastCancer.html
Replyhttp://www.nobreastcyst.com/xeno.html
this is fasinating
Replyhow old r u amanda
Reply