What Does it Take to Change Habits?
Certainly not a diagnosis of heart disease, according to a recent study. A one-year follow-up study of patients with heart disease uncovered that...
- Just 12.4 percent were eating five or more servings of vegetables a day
- 7.8 percent were eating at least four servings of fruit each day
- Fewer than 8 percent met recommendations for cereal fiber consumption.
- Trans fat consumption averaged 3.41% of calories (it should be 0 or very close to it)
- Just half had exercised for at least 20 minutes at least once in the past three months.
- About 80 percent of people don't go to cardiac rehabilitation programs after having a heart attack
The first thought that jumps out at me is; What is the matter with you people?! But taking a step back and looking at the totality of the situation, I wonder; what kind of guidance are these people getting? Is the seriousness of the message being delivered...and heard? (When a doctor says you have two choices, they mean life or death, not pine or mahogany).
Other points to ponder...
Are these people failing themselves 100%, or is our current medical model partially to blame? If so, to what extent should our system be obligated to help these people?
Is there adequate help available for those who genuinely desire to change their lives? What type of intervention might be more effective?
Has our increasingly poor food environment made this type of change too difficult for most?
I've almost resigned myself to the belief that some people simply do not have the hard wiring for this kind of change. I do hold out hope, however that people can change their ways, even if it takes many tries.
SOURCE: Journal of the American Dietetic Association, February 2008.

It's hard to get motivated to make any change when you cannot see immediate feedback. Looking at it on paper, it's easy to ask why people are so foolish, but when it's my grandfather, he's going to try it for a couple meals and think "I don't feel any better. This isn't working. What good is life without bacon anyway?"
ReplyI worked with a woman who at 42, had a heart attack, was revived twice. She was fairly overweight, didn't eat very well, smoked a pack a day and drank to excess. A prime candidate for heart disease.
Unfortunately she is now heavier than she was before, smokes and drinks more than she ever did and still eats very high cholestrol and fatty foods.
One of her stents failed after one year, this was sufficient to scare into healthy living for about one month only.
It is a bit sad really.
ReplyI can fully understand this no matter how much you tell some people that they have to change, it just doesn't seem to sink in maybe one day it will be to late for them but, thats just the way it is.
ReplyI'm not buying this need to eat at least 5 servings of vegetables a day. There is no evidence that says that amount is required.
ReplyI'm just guessing here, but I think one influence on the numbers of servings they use is if you have %%number of servings of something like vegetables their thinking is you will have less servings of processed stuff that's not good for you.
ReplyWhat if you eat more protein and dairy? I don't need more then 2-3 servings of veggies per day. I don't eat junk, period.
ReplyJust how do they define a serving?
There are some here and probably even authors believe that government should have more control of our lives.
ReplyI found this link to serving sizes.
http://www.5aday.org/html/consumers/serving.php
ReplyFine, don't eat that many. Not sure what you're trying to justify.
Replyseriously...
Reply"Required" is an interesting term that needs some quantification in this case. In terms of the relationship between fruit and veg. intake when it comes to cardiovascular risk, there is in fact an inverse relationship between fruit/veg intake and CVD.
The Nurses Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up study (almost 110,000 men and women) showed the higher the average daily intake of fruits and vegetables, the lower the chances of developing CVD. Compared with those in the lowest category of fruit and vegetable intake (less than 1.5 servings a day), those who averaged 8 or more servings a day were 30% less likely to have had a heart attack or stroke.
Reply1.) If the damn nutritional information wouldn't change EVERY month, maybe people would believe what they read. I also don't buy this "five serve sing" crap. That's like dieting by only taking five chews of your food. Nebulous numbers that are contradicted or adjusted capriciously is killing proper nutrition.
2.) After watching my Grandmother die at the age of 104, I have massive doubts that I want to live that long. It was not pretty.
Not that I want to die today, but this obsession that the 60's generation has with immortality (via food), is creepy and uninformed. There's this "big brother" attitude in nutritional circles that fosters rebellion.
3.) Some people want to live and die their own way.
ReplyConfusing messages can be problematic, however I think eating plenty of fruits and veggies has remained constant. I don't think one should make excuses because they don't know the exact number of servings they should have.
I do agree that there is a ton of conflicting info out there.
ReplyI think it's real hard for someone to change especially after they've gotten to that point.
My dad is only 63 and he's getting one lifestyle death sentence after another added on -- diabetes, heart disease, stroke, hypertension, high cholesterol (high LDL, low HDL) -- etc. Now, it's a bit harder for him to change being poor, not having much help, and being in a wheelchair, but even things he could change he just lets it, and has been letting it since long before those problems arouse -- kinda like, "Can't teach old dog new tricks" Some of these people feel hopeless and helpless.
There should be better cheap/free programs to help those who have gotten into this state improve-- to help them see it is NOT hopeless and they still can change.
ReplyI'm so sorry to hear about your dad, Heather. I have family members who are heading in that direction and it's painful to see - especially being in the field that I am in and STILL feeling helpless to help them.
ReplyAbsolutely. What is sad to me is that doctors never seem to encourage the natural options that really help (I see in friends and family members) -- a lot of them just give the medicine to treat the symptom of the larger problem.
ReplySome don't even get real access to better information - and if they could find it on their own, the doctor is who they look to and the doctor isn't saying - Change your habits; he's saying - Take these pills.
And I should clarify above - it is said, my dad has a terminal illness that scares people and they respond so strongly too.. but looking at the liver numbers and his other blood work-- it won't be this big scary terminal illness that kills him, it will be lifestyle factors. And his final years will not (and already are not) be pretty. His health is already so poor that he is physically and mentally slipping at an age where some of his former friends are still going strong.
It amazes me people who are scared of certain things but don't take lifestyle concerns seriously. I have a friend who freaks out about that stuff like SARS or Avian Flu, etc--- but eats fast food constantly and doesn't exercise. Why not focus on things you can control instead of worrying about the media-darling bug du jour that you likely can't?
ReplyMy grandfather passed away about 4 years ago from his 4th, yes 4TH, heart attack. He had his first heart attack at the age of 39 and it wasn't severe enough to really scare him into changing anything. He had a very sedentary lifestyle, was very overweight, and ate a lot of fatty foods (plus he had genetic hypercholesterolemia). At the age of 50, he suffered his second heart attack and required quintuple bypass surgery. That one scared him more...he tried eating lower sodium foods for a bit to try and lower his blood pressure, but that lasted about a month. I mean, my grandma tried SO HARD to get him to eat healthier and lose a little weight, but he just said "Well, something's eventually gonna kill me". In his early 60's, he had his third heart attack and required angioplasty. Soon after that, he suffered a few TIA's and also developed type 2 diabetes. He STILL refused to change his eating habits and he actually kind of ignored his diabetes...he never checked his blood sugar or anything. He developed glaucoma and pretty quickly, his quality of life was in the toilet...he could barely get around anymore because of the stroke damage and loss of circulation in his feet. He just kind of gave up on living at that point and didn't see any point in trying to get better. After he had the 4th heart attack, he finally had killed off enough of his heart muscle to kill him. It's a sad and tragic case, but I think if he had really committed to changing his lifestyle, my grandma wouldn't be a widow right now.
ReplyI'm very sorry to hear what your family had to go through, Spectra.
ReplyThat's just sad. I just don't understand why people won't protect their own body as well as they can. Maybe some people just don't fear death that much?
ReplyI don't really fear death. I don't even expect to make it to the average life expectancy for a woman. Most people in my family died young (early 60s) and I'm ok with that. I do, however, fear spending 10+ years with terrible health with heart disease and other things like that.
Maybe if people stopped thinking of doing healthier things as "ways to live longer" and started thinking of them as "ways to live better while you live", more people would care.
ReplyMy uncle smoked for close to 50 years. Had a massive heart attack and could have died had he not been near a hospital. He quit smoking that day and hasn't picked it back up. He has 3 lovely grandchildren, so I think he had good reasons to stay healthy. He could stand to lose a little weight, but he hasn't smoked in years, and that's pretty huge.
ReplyInsurance companies should pay a percentage for a weight loss program such as weight watchers or for a dietician before a medical problem arises and especially after. This way the people that really want to change would have support to keep them on track. I know they could still go to weight watchers or see a dietician on their own, but if the insurance covered a part of the meeting fee or office visit, I am sure you would have more people trying to change their eating habits.
Replywww.orb24.com
Not a bad idea, Susan, but there are some people out there who really just don't care about being healthier or thinner. I mean, like my grandpa was always being told to go on a diet and get thinner and he always said "Why? I'm happy like this and I like my eggs and bacon in the morning. I'm not about to change it to make some doctor happy". Some people really do just make a decision to stay fat and be ok with eating unhealthy things, just like some people decide to drink and drive or not wear their seat belts or other things that could end up killing them later on. But for those people out there that really don't know what options are out there, I could see an insurance company helping them find a diet program being an incredibly good idea.
ReplyI just heard recently, that in fact the Canadian government (in Canada, that's who covers the cost of health care, not insurance agencies)... anyway, the government has determined that you cost them more if you live to a ripe healthy old age than if you smoke or are obese because if you die younger you'll cost them less, even taking into consideration hospital and other health care costs. This goes right against the grain of popular opinion, as people have been grumbling for years that people who smoke or are overweight should pay more taxes because they cost taxpayers more. Apparently they were wrong. I'm not advocating smoking and obesity, I'm just sayin'...this is what they found out. So I guess by extension, it's in the insurance companies best interest to let customers stay fat, smoke heavily, and die.
On the other hand, my provincial health care did cover the cost of seeing a nutritionist, as long as I was referred by my doctor. And I didn't need to have any pressing reason to see the nutritionist, I just wanted to get some tips on diet for ADHD. If I wanted, I could have kept going to the nutritionist every week for a long time, and except for a nifty little test they did to check my metabolism that cost me $70 (because you need to purchase the equipment they use to do it, because using someone else's would be nasty), it was all covered by health care.
ReplyThis reminds me of an ex boyfriend of mine...he was diagnosed with cancer and continued to smoke and eat badly and so on.
ReplySome people just don’t care. Dad had two strokes and no one can imagine that because he is thin, doesn’t smoke and does exercise. Had he been overweight like his brothers and a stroke may have killed him, as it did with two of them. They all have cardiac problems due to genetic reasons, but some decided to just let it go.
My dad will be 70 in August, has gymnastic classes twice a week, and walks everyday for about an hour. Doctors were very surprise with his recovery, as the second stroke caused this left side to paralyze. He could never recover that fast and that good if he was overweight and sedentary. Yet, some members of the family (the older ones, of course) see no point in sports and healthy life style because “oh well, he takes care and still had it…”. Mum is 67 and has gymnastics and swimming classes, plus the walking.
I’m very proud of them, they look so much younger than their same age friends!
By the way, my city has a lot of sports for senior people, retired people have it for free. Municipal swimming pools, tennis courts and others facilities can be used for a very low fee. An hour in the swimming pool costs me 2.60 €, half the price of a MacDonalds meal.
ReplyIf city authorities see sport facilities as a right and not as a luxury, it would be great for overall health improvement, as private gyms tend to be overpriced.
If heart disease isn't a wake up call, what more do they need? These people have no one to blame but themselves.
So let them die. Weakness will thinned from the herd, through all time.
And it must be cut out from within ourselves, or we die too.
My grandpa was beaten by diabetes, in his early 60's. He never managed it properly. I miss his presence in my life. But he made the wrong choices, and now we're without him.
Yet that doesn't mean he's not still doing me some good. There's good in everything, even defeat.
ReplySo let them die? Are you serious? I think this is more than anything a call to make sure the information and access it out there to those who might want to take advantage.
I emailed my local senior center to offer free training sessions (I'm a personal trainer by profession) on weekends to help out - and some are saying, "Just let them die" Unbelievable!
ReplyLooks like Heather blew another gasket. Big surprise.
You should try my advice of "live and let die". It can't be that much fun banging your head against a wall.
ReplyLot's of interesting info in this article and the comments that ensued. I'm a little late but I'll post my 2 cents.
ReplyI think the problem with the majority of people is that they don't care if they live (longer). And they also don't care if it means they are making things harder on family (due to their death or financially). General unhappiness and lack of direction in life. It's very selfish in my opinion and purely a psychological problem.
I cringe when I hear people say they "need" bacon/icecream/sweets or whatever unhealthy food. It's disgusting, ignorant, and honestly makes me lose respect for them.
I found a program that is healthy and shows immediate results. I told my obese brother and his wife. There comment "we're not ready for a life style change right now". HELLO! They are not going to have a life to worry about. I seriously had to step away and try not to think about it. They are adults.
ReplyI think there have been a lot of good points raised here. From my perspective as a psychologist who specialized in behavioural medicine-i.e. in short, supporting and guiding people with medical diagnoses to change any behaviours that are impeding their physical and mental health, I believe that fear and threats do little to motivate change. Unfortunately, education, support, and cognitive-behavioural interventions cost health care systems a lot more than pills, so most people do not get any help in changing their habits. As anyone who has ever made a New Year's Resolution knows, it is difficult to change behaviour in the best of scenarios, not to mention when you are reeling from the effects of a major health scare that could have implications for many facets of your life. In fact, there is a strong relationship between major depression and myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). If you are suffering from depression, it is unlikely that you have the will and motivation to pursue these challenging lifestyle changes. I think it's sad that we blame people for not "smartening up" when we all do things we know we "shouldn't" in various realms. Just my two cents.
ReplyThe bottom line is which way will you choose?
Eat healthy, exercise, seek medical advice.
Or do nothing?
You have everything to gain or alot to lose.
ReplyThis is great reading! The more discussion of our obesity problems helps us all to realize how devastating the overeating of food really is. The only way I've found to lose weight and keep it off is thru mental change. Food based dieting just doesn't work long term. If it did, we'd have only one diet and we'd all be skinny and healthy. Look for ways to change your relationship with food and you'll find the true secret.
ReplyIt's a complex problem that needs a method/system to overcome. The solution needs to increase and maximize the desire to change, clarity of the benefits and motivation to change as well as create understanding of the major hurdle--reactive conditioned behavior.
Reply~ Mike.
Part of the blame has to be the marketing of the food industry and the lack of economical healthy food options.
Reply