Rachel Hunter and Slim-Fast: Hypocrisy

Fashion Model Rachel Hunter has signed up with Slim-Fast. Hunter is to be the new face of Slim-Fast (owned by Unilever - promoted with the "Find Your Slim" program.).
Slim-Fast says:
Rachel will incorporate Slim-Fast into her life as an approach to reaching her personal weight loss goal.
According to People, Hunter is 5' 10" and currently weighs 147lbs. That gives her a BMI of 21. So why the need for Slim-Fast?
"As I've gotten older, I can't eat as much as I used to," says Hunter. But while she'll slurp the 190-calorie shakes for breakfast and lunch, she'll still cook favorites like pasta and steak for kids [...] "The diet is not something I want to involve my daughter in – there are already too many stresses on teens. We sit down and eat dinner together." (from People)
Also from Hunter "it’s freeing to be encouraged to set and achieve your own personal weight loss goal. That was a message I wanted to help spread."
How is drinking a few shakes "freeing" exactly? This isn't about promoting strength training for women, or self-belief, or walking 10,000 steps a day.
Such endorsements highlight the mistaken notions promulgated by the "diet industry" - that self-esteem comes in the shape of a packet mix, and that all women everywhere should always be thinking about losing weight.
As cynical as it sounds, the only celebrities who are willing to front a diet program are those who are passed their career prime.
What the... is it really that difficult to find breakfasts that are around 200 kcal? I mean breakfasts with real food.
ReplyShe looks great to me! Has anyone seen the commcercial for her new show...Celebrity Circus on NBC. It starts June 11th at 9:30 central and she looks GREAT!
Check it out!
ReplyIt does appear that when someone needs to give their career a jump start, they look for a diet plan to promote, doesn't it?
Brian
Replyno. and that's what gets me about crap like this. i hate replacement meals that require you to eat something with the same amount of calories in a good, nutritious and filling plate of food. it's ridiculous, imo.
in society, i think there is some pressure to be thinner than you are. everybody seems to be on a diet even when they do not need to be. i feel sorry for rachel's daughter because she's deluding herself if she doesn't believe her daughter wont get the impression that even thin women need to diet just because she's having dinner with her. she's heading the whole damn campaign and is supposedly drinking shakes. if her daughter has eyes and ears then she'll see this and i think she can be influenced by it. even if rachel drills it into her head that women don't need to diet, her actions are saying a different thing. on the other hand, it's doubtful that rachel will actually follow this. she is a rich woman - she has access to top personal trainers, the best gyms, food delivery services, even personal chefs - there is no need for her to do slim fast. but of course, she'll put her face to the company for the $$$...which is still sends out the wrong message anyway to those who believe that even she feels the need to use this.
i find it kind of sad that a normal woman is now the face of a weight-loss product. rachel has never even been overweight, at least not to the public's knowledge.
Reply"It does appear that when someone needs to give their career a jump start, they look for a diet plan to promote, doesn't it?"
Fact.
ReplyI also wonder how consumers could be so willfully dumb as to buy the idea that if Hunter decides to use Slim Fast, that it means anything at all about their own chances for success. She's already super-skinny!
At least take a FAT washed up actress or model, and then put them on Slim Fast. If they get super-skinny, it still doesn't mean much (given their trainers & chefs and financial incentives, etc), but it might mean something!
ReplySlim-fast seems to me so archiac, something from the snake oil days of yore. Time for retirement.
Replyhaving thin women endorse a product makes it look like you have to start that way in order to stay that way. stupid.
ReplyBalonnnnnnnney. :)
ReplyThis is total BS. I only hope that consumers will call bluff. Unfortunately, from what I've seen, they probably won't.
ReplyI find it ironic that she expressed concern for "teen pressures" when she is sending an absolutely ludicrous (and possibly damaging) idea about nutrition to them everywhere, regardless of her one-normal-meal-a-day.
To me, this looks pretty desperate on her part. It's not hard to eat solid (real) meals and achieve weight loss goals and she knows it. It's the worst kind of sell out. Disappointing.
Egads, but Slim Fast tastes like crap! I'm pretty sure that the company is looking for someone...anyone to promote the product as more and more people learn about a little thing called a 'healthy diet.' Why would you want to slurp down a tiny, nasty milkshake when you could have a balanced breakfast that's also yummy?
ReplyWell, it is easier, cause it's harder to get out than to stay out. That's why the whole obesity problem must be addressed in childhood with schools doing everything they can since they have the opportunity to make a positive impact.
ReplyOh, no--a BMI of 21?! How awful! And crap--mine's 22!! I'd better run out right now and get some Slim Fast! *sarcastic smirk* As if her teenage daughter isn't going to know what's going on--her already skinny mom trying to get even skinnier. What kind of message does that send? Talk about pressure.
ReplyAnd have you read the ingredient list on these things? Just loaded with preservatives and chemicals and all diffferent types of sugars and, why is that HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP? Yes it is. Jolly good stuff that, yes? NO!
Whatever happened to some fresh fruit and yoghurt? Whole grain toast? And the like. That would be far better, me'thinks.
Cheers!
Replyi agree with the person above who said that Slim Fast seems so archaic. I thought we were past this; have some fresh fruit and cereal, for goodness sakes!
ReplyGod, I hate Slimfast. My mom used to do it sometimes to lose a dress size and I used to sneak the shakes and drink them for breakfast. They were chalky and made me jittery. How hard is it, seriously, to find breakfasts for 200 calories that are actual food? Not very, I'll tell you that. I can name off a few...eat a couple of eggs (75-80 calories a pop) or a bowl of oatmeal with a bit of brown sugar or fruit or a yogurt. Just about anything is better than a carageenan/HFCS-laden milkshake.
And what's up with using Rachel Hunter as a spokesperson for it? She's about the last person that needs to lose weight, but I guess I've noticed that Slimfast really only works if you don't have a ton of weight to lose. It'd be hard to do that plan for a long-term solution.
ReplySlim Fast doesn't seem like a meal to me, more like a glass of fake chocolate milk. Also, I'm still hungry afterwards. A shake for breakfast, a shake for lunch, and a sensible dinner??? By dinnertime, I'm ready to eat a whole cow. Seriously, hooves and stomachs and all!
ReplyI hate the whole idea of a diet in a packet instead of eating whole foods. I have to say I'm even a little skeptical of vitamins (although I do take a few). It seems to me we really ought to be able to get all our nutrients from good, wholesome food.
However, I am not sure I agree with the idea that slim women shouldn't be conscious of their weight at all. I was slim once, and I didn't take appropriate measures when I started putting on a few pounds. Now I have 40 pounds to lose just to reach my healthy BMI range.
It seems to me that healthy, slim people should remain aware of their weight so that they can maintain it.
Maintaining weight with Slimfast is not what I would recommend, and I don't think that Rachel Hunter is the best model for a weightloss diet, but I don't agree that it's wrong for her to be concerned about maintaining her weight.
ReplySlim fast strawberry shakes have a good protein to carbohydrate but their new Optima Bar line contains trans fats. . Their website talks about the harmful effects of trans fats and they play the "0" trans fats game because the product has less than .5 gm per serving.
ReplySlim fast is bad. It doesn't help you lose weight at all. Its a diet fad that doesn't work. I feel its a diet fad aimed at people who are pressed for time.
I personally would rather have two hard boiled eggs on toast then a slim fast shake. My breakfast would be more filling, tastier and nutritious....not to mention less expensive.
ReplyI think I'm with everyone else in saying the has-been celebrities/models heading diet plans have less to do with their BMI and more to do with their bottom line.
ReplyShe's doing something to spread a message that every woman feels they need to lose some weight from time to time and that's a personal decision.
Talk about hypocrisy - look at all the "quick fix" google ads this website has...
Seriously people...lighten up.
Replyi think all celebrities got mad ,they don't think about any thing except "how they will look like?' infront of cameras .
Replythey don't care about their own feelings, that losing weight all the time lead to the feeling of desperate.
actually when they got thinner they aren't attractive or sexy anymore bec, we see only the bones of their bodies
My sister-in-law saw Rachel on some weight-loss show last Fall (??) and said she was indeed chubby. Maybe she's lost weight since then and wants to lose a bit more. Also, I don't think the BMI is the holy grail of thinness indicators. Every body looks different at different weights and BMIs...women KNOW what their bodies look like under clothes, and I respect their right to decide how they want to look. And as for this notion that that we need to "accept and love ourselves/our bodies"...BALONEY. Have you all looked around lately?? We are a tubby, tubby nation.
ReplyI agree that eating a high-quality, whole foods type breakfast is ideal, but for most of my life, I've had extreme difficulty eating solid foods in the morning. It literally made me feel nauseous. I tried drinking Slim-Fast for breakfast only, and it helped me get some calories and nutrition in me without making me sick. However, I much prefer the taste of Instant Breakfast. The only issue there is having milk to mix with it.
Replyyeah and that's a bad message to be spreading. people shouldn't be "losing weight from time to time" but staying physically active and maintaining a healthy weight instead of yo-yo dieting. where's the messages for that idea? overshadowed by the billion $ diet industry.
there is too much pressure on women to always lose more weight even if they do not need to. there are tabloids with digusting headlines such as "worst beach bodies" followed with the picture of a celeb with some minor flaw many women have. it's quite sick, imo, when there are girls as young as 6 thinking they need to go on a diet and even suffering from eating disorders. things need to change fast because this "everyone on a diet" culture is horrible.
additionally, i'm sure the ads on this site are randomly generated by google from the keywords in this website such as "diet" etc. i dont think this website has any control of the ads. i'm also sure that they help keep this site free. so i dont know...Diet Blog can remove the ads and then you can pay to complain that people need to lighten up on this site. in the meantime, i do not see the issue. the ads above are clearly not representative of what this blog is about. running a website is not definately not free or cheap.
ReplyI'm gonna go to Target and poke holes in all of the slim-fast boxes with an icepick. See ya!
Replywhat frustrates me most about slim fast shakes is that the only people i ever see have them are my highschool female class mates or the occasional wrestlers (who will devide one amidst four or so of them). the products are loaded with sugars that make you crave not only a second shake but maybe an accompaning candy bar as well. i like the advice that one other poster said about replacing a breakfast shake with a yogurt and wheat toast... yum :)
ReplyI tried very good shakes before. It have some effects. So, I don't think it's a bad idea.
But drinking shakes and not having proper diet and exercise doesn't really last long. We can "slim fast" and can be "fat fast" too.
ReplyFor a model though, Rachel is at a heavier weight. And she is pretty curvy. I think she'd make a good spokesperson. 147lbs for 5'10" is a reasonable, healthy weight.
ReplyThe key is how you incorporate the Slim Fast diet into your life. I'm a former college runner who lost 30 post-baby pounds (from 5'7" 156lbs to 5'7" 126lbs) this past year using Slim Fast, so to say that it doesn't work isn't accurate. I do agree that the diet is difficult to stick to long term, which is why, as I lost the weight, I also did extensive research on nutrition to help me adapt to a "real food" diet once I was off of the shakes. I continue to run 40 miles a week, but my appetite is nowhere near as voracious as it was before Slim Fast and, motivated by the weight loss and desire to be and stay healthy, my overall diet is now extremely balanced and nutritious. It's all about making total lifestyle changes - Slim Fast is just one way to kick those changes into gear.
ReplyBoy, what a lot of sour pusses. I don't think that sliim-fast is all that bad. I consulted with a diatician and was told that diabetics can use slim-fast with thier diet program.
ReplyBooyah. I agree about the sour pusses. Your missing the point with Slim Fast. Some people just need the control of one glass of liquid supplement. They don't want to deal with preparing a meal and counting calories. Slim fast may indeed be archaic but it works. It isn't meant to be long term. Good grief. There is nothing wrong with a meal replacement bar or shake once in a while.
ReplyWhy so many celebrities are so slim? Is slim really beautiful? I don't think so.
I think "big is beautiful!" "beauty is sizeless!". This has been approved in hot big people&celebrity dating site www.plusmeet.com
Reply