Low-Sugar Cereals: A Lot of Sweet Nothing
For those of us who like to grab the reduced-sugar versions of our favorite cereals:
Experts who reviewed the lower-sugar versions of six major brands of sweetened cereals at the request of The Associated Press found they have no significant nutritional advantages over their full-sugar counterparts.Researchers found that the cereals are virtually identical in calories, carbs, fat, and fiber.
Apparently it's all about the crunch. To preserve the foods texture the manufacturers replace the "sugar" with other carbs that have the same amount of calories and are no better for you.
Feel like you've been taken for a ride? Get this:
Officials at General Mills, Kellogg's and Post were unable to explain why the new cereals are a better choice, but noted they give consumers more options about how much sugar they eat.Company officials said they were responding to parents' demands for products with less sugar and that they aren't claiming these cereals are any healthier than the originals.
Maybe we should all stick to plain oatmeal... but have you tried giving that to a sweet-toothed 4 year old?
Written By J. Foster
Good news, I am 12 years old and I doing a report on the two points of view on cereal ( why it is good and why it is bad. And I will let the info. to my class on Monday!
ReplyFrom Danielle Glentz Who thanks you!
Yes I am also 12, and I am also doing and report on the SAME exact thing, and this info helped ALOT! Now all I need is some pictures and I'm good to go! Thanks again!
Replysame here gues this project is popular!!!!!!!!
Reply