You are in: Home / Cardio / Debunking Time Magazine's "Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin"

Debunking Time Magazine's "Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin"

db fat guy exercising.jpg

TIME Magazine dropped a bomb shell article last week called, "Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin". This piece has ignited discussions and debates in blogospheres, talk shows and water coolers alike. I'm hoping to accomplish 2 goals with this entry:

  1. Briefly explain why this fluff piece belongs in a magazine that features Jon and Kate (whoever they are), Octomom, and the stars from that literary-turned-box-office disaster, "Twilight."
  2. Set the record straight about exercise and fat loss once and for all (for now, anyway).

In my mind there are a handful of crucial pitfalls the media tend to fall victim to when reporting on matters of health/fitness/nutrition:

  1. The use of anecdotal evidence to support claims.
  2. The haphazard use of blanket statements and universal qualifiers.
  3. Keeping things vague in order to support said claims.
  4. Eliminating the nuisance of fact checking.

In summary, the article essentially claims that exercise won't help you lose weight, and may in fact be responsible for people GAINING weight. Hmmm... The author, John Cloud (ooh the irony in that surname) goes on an anecdotally-based tirade, side-stepping contradictory evidence and common sense on route to his perplexing hypothesis.

Instead of droning on about the shortcomings of this article, I'm going to dole out some point-form bits about exercise and fat loss, hopefully undoing some of the misinformation that John "head in the" Cloud has created.

Exercise and Fat Loss: The Facts!

  • Everybody should exercise for the health benefits first and foremost - there is no debate here - exercise is good for you. (In fairness, this is touched on in the article).
  • Exercise in the absence of healthy eating and calorie control will not be very effective for fat loss.
  • The term "exercise" is extremely broad in its definition, and hence we need to specify what kind of "exercise" we are talking about in order to draw a conclusion about its efficacy. I think we can all agree that there is a pretty substantial difference between walking on a treadmill at 2.3 mph, and doing barbell complexes and HIIT (high intensity interval training). This is where John Cloud looks to have graduated from the Gary Taubes school of ambiguity.
  • Type (resistance vs. cardio), duration, intensity, frequency - these all have varying impacts on muscle tissue development, hormonal response, calorie expenditure, and henceforth the ability to burn fat.
  • The familiar rhetoric that "overweight people eat no more, or exercise no less, than thin people" needs to be scrutinized, as obese people tend to underreport food intake, and over report physical activity.
  • In the meta-analyses (compilation of studies) regarding exercise and weight loss, exercise typically has a "modest" effect on weight loss. Again, it's not going to do much in the absence of dietary change. Please note that "modest" does not mean "useless" or "counterproductive" or "a waste of time".
  • On studies that have a diet only, exercise only, and exercise plus diet groups, the exercise plus diet groups (with scant exception) come out on top when it comes to weight/fat loss. Diet only, almost always beats out exercise only.
  • One very well conducted 12 week study by Kramer et. al., which included both aerobic, strength training, and a dietary control, showed the following results. Fat mass losses - diet only: 6.7kg, diet/cardio: 7kg, diet/cardio/resistance: 10kg. Most noteworthy - the D+C+R group lost almost no lean tissue whatsoever, whereas the diet only group lost almost 3kg worth of lean tissue.
  • Putting on and saving muscle tissue will have a lasting impact on your body's ability to lose fat. Plus you will look much better.
  • Exercise becomes more important once you have lost the weight. Exercise should be a central strategy in preventing a re-gain.
  • Pertaining to the above, the National Weight Loss Registry (which tracks those who have lost and kept off at least 30 lbs), shows that high levels of physical activity are a primary predictor of success.

What About Exercise and Hunger?

Does exercise cause people to eat more? Before we even get into the science, let's apply a little common sense here. Going to Starbucks for an oat fudge bar, and a caramel macchiato after you walk on the treadmill for 20 minutes WON'T GET YOU ANYWHERE.

Many people are under the delusion that they can eat more if they are active. Again, these people don't tend to lose fat. Dietary restraint is needed whether you are exercising a bit, a lot, or not at all. People who get this don't deliberately sabotage their efforts by indulging in sugar/fat/salt bombs. And guess what? They see results.

Insofar as exercise compelling us to eat more and crave junk? Not very convincing when you comb the literature. In fact, there are a great deal of studies that show exercise DOES NOT make you hungrier, and/or lead to eating above and beyond what you've burned.

Of course, there are those who are more susceptible to overeating in response to exercise (the so-termed "overcompensators"), and women in particular have more of a tendency towards this. But again, it comes down to a little restraint and common sense.

Moreover, research has also shown that athletes and lean people experience more of an increased appetite in response to exercise than do overweight individuals.

And further still, timing also has a lot to do with hunger and exercise as well. Another dose of... you guessed it, common sense! Don't go too long without eating before you exercise or you will be very hungry afterwards. Genius.

There are references below demonstrating that exercise does not cause overeating, but here is a quote from a noted researcher on the subject, C. Alan Titchenal:

Energy intake in humans is generally increased or unchanged in response to exercise. When energy intake increases in response to exercise it is usually below energy expenditure, resulting in negative energy balance and loss of bodyweight and fat. Thus, if energy intake is expressed relative to energy expenditure, appetite is usually reduced by exercise."

Don't Jump

I think this sort of issue needs to be addressed, as it only serves to inundate the public with half-truths and mistruths. I've scanned a few discussion boards on the topic and a typical response will read something like this:

OMGTHISISSOFREAKINGTRU! I werkout like all teh tyme and I'm not loosing any wait. I think I'll just do teh master clenz and stop going to teh gym FTW."

I'm all in favour of questioning conventional wisdom, but you must look at the totality of the evidence and adjust to your specific situation.

Next up: How to properly maximize exercise in a fat loss plan.

References:


  1. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, Boucher JL, Histon T, Caplan W, Bowman JD, Pronk NP. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc 107:1755 -1767, 2007

  2. McGuire, M.T., Wing, R.R., Klem, M.L., Lang, W. and Hill, J.O. (1999). What predicts weight regain in a group of successful weight losers? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 177-185.

  3. Blundell JE, cross talk between physical activity and appetite control: does physical activity stimulate appetite? Proc Nutr Soc, 62, 651-661. 2003

  4. Donahoo WT, Variability in energy expenditure and its components. Curr Op Clin Nutr Metab. 7: 599-605. 2004.

  5. Titchenal A., Exercise and Food Intake: what is the relationship? Sports Med, 6: 135-145. 1988

  6. Yoshioka M, Impact of high-intensity exercise on energy expenditure, lipid oxidation and body fatness. Int J Obes. 25, 332-339. 2001

  7. King NA, et al, Individual variability following 12 weeks of supervised exercise: Identification and characterization of compensation for exercise-induced weight loss. Int J Obes, 32, 177-184, 2008.

  8. King NA, effects of exercise on appetite control: Implications for energy balance. Med Sci Sport Exer, 29(8): 1076-1089. 1997

  9. King, NA, The relationship between physical activity and food intake. 57: 77-84. 1998.

  10. Lluch A, Exercise enhances palatability of food, but does not increase food consumption, in lean restrained females. Int J Obes, 21: supp a129.Melzer K., effects of physical activity on food intake. Clin Nutr, 24: 885-895. 2005

  11. Slentz CA. Effects of the amount of exercise on body weight, body composition, and measures of central obesity. Arch Intern Med. 164: 31-39. 2004

  12. Ballard TP, Melby CL, Camus H, Cianciulli M, Pitts J, Schmidt S, Hickey MS. Effect of resistance exercise, with or without carbohydrate supplementation, on plasma ghrelin concentrations and postexercise hunger and food intake. Metabolism. 2009 Jun 2.

  13. Dermott M, McDaniel JL, Weiss EP, Tomazic TJ, Mattfeldt-Beman M J Nutr Elder. Is physical activity associated with appetite? A survey of long-term care residents. 2009 Jan-Mar;28(1):72-80.

Read More

61 Comments

Jon

I'm not going to refute any of the facts of your article because I honestly believe you've done a TON of research.

But:

1) To be fair, it seems like you should add a disclaimer to this article that you make money getting people to exercise. While everything here may be factually accurate, you do have a potential bias.

2) There's no need to use an ad hominem attack by insulting the magazine in which the article appeared or the author's surname. Your research should be able to stand on it's own.

Reply
Barry

Sorry, I don't see anywhere that he insults Time Magazine, deserving as it is of heaping piles of scorn and ridicule not only for this article but for other frequent and repeated abuses of journalism.

Reply
Anya

The following would probably classify as an ad hominim attack, and I certainly almost did not read any further but decided to see if he could put a cogent argument together.

" 1. Briefly explain why this fluff piece belongs in a magazine that features Jon and Kate (whoever they are), Octomom, and the stars from that literary-turned-box-office disaster, "Twilight." "

The following is an attack by implication and generalisation, once again not backed up with any specific instances (though I must say I agree with its substance):

In my mind there are a handful of crucial pitfalls the media tend to fall victim to when reporting on matters of health/fitness/nutrition:

1. The use of anecdotal evidence to support claims.
2. The haphazard use of blanket statements and universal qualifiers.
3. Keeping things vague in order to support said claims.
4. Eliminating the nuisance of fact checking.

Reply
Mike Howard

Anya,

I thought it was when I implied that his last name was appropriate given where his head was (and that's being polite... I'm not really allowed to say where I REALLY think John Clouds head is). I agree that this is ad hominem.

The examples you give as ad hominem are a stretch at best, IMO.

Reply
Mike Howard

Thanks for your comments, Jon.

To be clear, yes part of my profession is prescribing exercise but it is also teaching people how to eat well, how to change habits through a sound mindset. My formal education is in exercise science, but my "job" is to find the most effective and efficient ways for people to reach their goals of which exercise is only part of.

Ad hominem? Probably guilty - I was fired up when I wrote this so it probably manifested itself on an attack of John Cloud.

Biased? You bet I am. I am biased against misinformation, quackery and other such nonsense. I have a bias towards good science, common sense and logic. Please note that having a bias is not the same as having a prejudice.

Reply
Mr7

While i think that exercise will help you lose weight, i think the Time article is a bit more pragmatic. ie. ppl dont exercise while in controlled research studies, they are vulnerable to basic social pressures of daily life.

So, someone who does a bit of exercise may end up eating more (than they burn), this happens all the time... or they may give up and gain weight again, etc. Its the one peeve i have with exercise guides that list gardening and walking as exercise.. ppl do those activities and expect to get some cardio or weight loss benefit.

So, exercise will help you lose weight in absolute, scientific terms. But, people dont live in bubbles and other factors will come into play. Also, its the one article on exercise that i did read.. since most preach exercise as good, this was the opposite and caught my interest.

Reply
Mike Howard

Yes, real life situations may be different than controlled studies, however the point I tried to hammer home was this;

Whether or not we exercise, dietary restraint must me practiced. We need to stop blaming the lack of restraint on exercise - like John Cloud does.

Reply
Brad Schoenfeld, CSCS

Very nicely stated! I did a similar research-based rebuttal on my blog. Hopefully intelligent commentary will make people realize that just because something is published in a magazine doesn't make it true.

Also, it's important to note the extreme variability in subjects when looking at studies. If one subject loses 8 pounds from exercise/diet and another decides to compensate and "reward" himself/herself by raiding the fridge so that they gain weight, it will nullify much of the true effects of exercise. This has been shown in several studies.

Brad Schoenfeld, CSCS

Reply
Mike Howard

Good points, Brad. Thanks for chiming in!

Reply
Mike

Great entry with a lot of research!!

Jon, although you may think this post is biased, but I agree with it 100%. Although I do not have any background in nutrition or fitness, I read Time's article and thought it was false.

If you'd like to see an average Joe's take on the Time article, please click the link below. I try to explain how a lot of Mr. Clouds facts are false by using my exererience of losing 31lbs this year.

Reply
Vanessa42

I think the time article is spot on. I tried for 5 years to lose weight in the gym. My weight went down and back up again. Honestly, I didn't take a complete or should I say "whole" approach to my weight loss. Now, I am. I eat healthier at work and have cut back considerably on mindless snacking. I invested in a Basikbox (its new). It is a simple yet very functional portion control lunch box I can take with me to work. It is great for storing fresh vegetables, fruits, vegetables, snacks and other food items I can snack on through out the day. I love it because it makes sense when you're super busy and don't want to eat junk food at your desk.

Reply
PRHL

Indeed: The term "exercise" is extremely broad in its definition.
And therefor it *CAN* be true that you can / must eat more if you are active. Half an hour of jogging can burn 500 kcal, that depends on various factors like your fitness and your speed. So if you stop exercising, you have to reduce your calorie intake.

Reply
Bethany

My husband and I have been debating this for DAYS. I still stand by the idea that whether it actually helps in fat loss or not (I believe it does), it's still important for disease-prevention, balance, mental health, cardiovascular fitness, etc. etc. Great piece, Mike.

Reply
Melanie Thomassian R.D.

I totally agree with you Bethany, I think we need to consider our health as a whole, it shouldn't just be about weight loss or looking good, etc. Without a doubt exercise improves our health, that's a good enough reason for me to keep doing it.

Good work on this piece Mike!

Reply
Mike Howard

Thanks for your comments, Bethany and Melanie!

Reply
Jody - Fit at 52

I wrote a whole post on this so I will just say that I am with you, Mike. I think that people will use this study as an excuse not to exercise. I have always said that food is a huge part of weight loss BUT exercise is also important as well. PLUS, as you said above, the health benefits & that is something I talked to in my post as well.

AND, people that get weight loss surgery. It comes down to food AND exercise to keep the weight off.

I really disliked that article because it essentially gives people an "excuse".

I have found that food is at least 65% of the battle BUT without my exercise & weights, I would not be where I am now at almost 52 years old.

Thx for your great commentary!

Reply
Spectra

I think a large part of the equation is that many people do not know how many calories they are indeed truly using when they exercise. Walking around the block at a leisurely pace is not a "workout" and maybe burns 150 calories. If you count that as your "30 minutes of cardio" and eat an extra 500 calories that day, you'll gain weight...it's not exactly rocket science. But if you indeed are training hard, you'll burn some calories. Michael Phelps obviously hasn't heard of this study...during the training season, he eats 12,000 calories a day and he's not exactly what I'd call "fat".

Of course, following a healthy diet is probably about 80% of the weight loss equation for the majority of the population, you can't discount the obvious benefits of exercise: building muscle, increasing bone density, improving heart health, better skin tone, better sleep, etc.

Reply
ArrowSmith

Exercise without weight training is not exercise.

Reply
Mark

I am a bit taken aback by this statement: "Many people are under the delusion that they can eat more if they are active."

From my own experience, after I workout at the gym, within an hour or two, I am very hungry; thus I eat. The time.com article is stating exactly what I experience. There is nothing "delusional" about eating when you're hungry, especially when becoming more active.

I used to wonder why I was not losing any weight, as I did treadmill about 45 min per day, was not over-indulging in food, but after my workouts, I was really, really hungry.

I also found that I did NOT crave sweets after a workout, as I felt good that I had exercised well (so no caramel macchiatos for me!).

I have, however, found that I am one of those people who do not respond well to carbohydrates. Once I significantly reduced them, I lost 15 pounds in just a few weeks and, ironically, was not doing much of the treadmill.

This is not my opinion... it's my experience.


Reply
Mike Howard

I think you misunderstood what I was saying there, Mark - allow me to clarify.

Many people are somehow under the impression that they can stuff their faces simply because they exercise. These people don't tend to lose any weight and often gain.

In terms of your experience, sure you may be hungry after you workout and you should eat. What I'm saying is eat responsibly. How long before you exercise are you eating? As I mentioned this is often the problem with people being "starving" after a workout.

Reply
Mark

I believe I did understand what you had originally written... it's just that I disagree.

Your quote: "Many people are under the delusion that they can eat more if they are active."

From my experience, people DO eat more BECAUSE they are more active. If one believes in calories in-calories out theory, then burning more calories will, of course, result in being hungry more often.

It's like taking your car for a trip... if you use up gas, you'll need to refill more often. The Time article just simply make sense. Obviously, it's a bad idea to fill up on Snickers Bars and chips, but the basic concept of eating more because you're hungrier more (because you're burning off more calories) make sense.

Reply
Mike Howard

Ok - then I suppose we disagree. Again there is a pretty substantial body of research showing that even if you do eat slightly more in response to exercise, this doesn't mean you'll overcompensate to a point where you will eat more than you have burned.

It's this nonsense of exercise preventing us from losing weight I find absurd.

Reply
Anonymous

I think the eating issue, post work out, or overeating due to exercise has a lot to do with where you are physically.

A high-level athlete who has always been active and is in good physical condition, who decides to start an intensive training program for a marathon or triathalon, will obviously begin to take in more calories. This person already has a high metabolism and has little to no fat to burn and is beginning a really intense training regiment. It's the sudden change in intensity paired with the lack of stored resources that requires the increase in caloric intake. But keep in mind that this food would likely be very healthy and the athlete would be aware of what they're eating.

Compare this to someone who is overweight and begins an exercise routine for weight loss. This individual likely has stored energy resources (fat) and has no need for increased caloric intake. Initially there may be a feeling of hunger or exhaustion (which some people associate with the need to eat), but this is simply a response to the shock your body goes through when you begin to exercise. If a steady healthy diet is maintained, then that "hunger", or uncomfortable feeling, will go away shortly after your body adjusts to the new demands that are being put on it.

The first scenario, or one similar, is the best explination for why people have this misconception that exercise causes this increased appetite or that active people eat so much more. Of course, highly competive individuals consume more. Michael Phelps is not on a 2000 calorie diet!

Reply
Don Johnson

I believe that you have used every bit as much if not more anecdotal information in your article than Cloud did. I'm on a weight loss quest personally and the article rang true for me. I was absolutely famished when I got home from a workout, it was being counter-productive so I'm still tinkering with my program. I'll get it figured out and it will work for me ultimately. A very good friend of mine ran daily but couldn't lose weight, only tore up his knees. He quit running, went on the South Beach Diet and today is 92 pounds lighter and runs to help maintain his weight. There is a timing element to this and the Time article called that out in my opinion.

Reply
Mike Howard

Hi Don,

Yeah - I believe you do have to "tinker" as does everyone to find what works best. I wish you all the best in that pursuit.

Which aspect of my thoughts did you find I was speaking anectdotally? I would want the opportunity to try and offer some evidence.

Reply
Harry

I can't find a source for the 12-week Kramer research. Could you post a link to an abstract?

Reply
realitytruthprozac

Sorry, but Mike Howard bashes the Time article, and then proceeds to basically AGREE and REHASH the Time article.
People can eradicate the benefits of exercise by overeating. What a totally useless blog entry.

Reply
Mike Howard

Hmmmmm...

TIME article: Exercise makes you hungry, therefore you eat more, therefore exercise is the very thing keeping us fat and making us fatter.

Me: Exercise aids fat loss and in most studies does NOT show compensatory eating to the point of weight gain.

Therefore, no I don't agree with the TIME article. There are some aspects where I don't disagree - yes. Unchecked dietary diligence can (and usually does) cause weight gain - even when you exercise.

Reply
realitytruthprozac

First, you don't cite your sources where "most studies do NOT show compensatory eating to the point of weight gain" So, you are guilty of the very same 4 things you accuse the Time author of!

Second, your 2nd bullet point of facts was: "Exercise in the absence of healthy eating and calorie control will not be very effective for fat loss." That is basically the whole point of the Time article. Nutrition trumps exercise. Your reading comprehension is poor, read it again.

Reply
Mike Howard

First: Did you actually read the entire piece - including the references? Please read references 3 through 13 which address the studies that I supposedly didn't cite.

Second: I never disagreed with the fact that diet trumps exercise and I stated so. However, this was NOT the premise of the article. If Cloud would have stated this somewhere, I would have acknowledged my concurrence with him. The issue (which I've already explained) is the premise of the article was that exercise is unhelpful for losing weight and in fact is keeping us fat - because it causes us to eat more junk. To wit;

The subtext of the title reads;

"Whether because exercise makes us hungry or because we want to reward ourselves, many people eat more — and eat more junk food, like doughnuts — after going to the gym."

Sounds like he's saying exercise is unhelpful for losing weight and in fact is keeping us fat - because it causes us to eat more junk. NOT THAT DIET TRUMPS EXERCISE.

"But like many other people, I get hungry after I exercise, so I often eat more on the days I work out than on the days I don't. Could exercise actually be keeping me from losing weight?"

Again, sounds here like he's saying exercise is unhelpful for losing weight and in fact is keeping us fat - because it causes us to eat more junk. NOT THAT DIET TRUMPS EXERCISE.

"Could pushing people to exercise more actually be contributing to our obesity problem? In some respects, yes."

Know what this sounds like? Like he's saying exercise is unhelpful for losing weight and in fact is keeping us fat - because it causes us to eat more junk. NOT THAT DIET TRUMPS EXERCISE.

Reply
Gmoney

Realitytruchprozac,

Are you insane? You clearly missed the point of this blog if you are accusing the author of the same misleading info that Time magazine has circulated. John Cloud does not substantiate his argument and leaves many of his facts unsupported. The author of this blog attempts to list known facts and provides statements based on his knowledge of those facts.

Reply
Coach Mike

Half an hour of jogging is unlikely to burn 500 kcal, and Mike is right - most people over-estimate how much they exercise, and seriously under-estimate how much they eat.

We need to exercise and "burn" about 350 kcal a day to put or body in a self-regulating state. Without question, patients who come into hospital and can't eat for whatever reason, lose weight. The "input" side of the equation is easy. Once you exercise and discover just how much work it takes to burn off just 100 kcal, you realize it is easier to cut down on what you eat than it is to "burn it off". But people who are sedentary overeat - and that is a simple biological fact.

A simple change is avoid sugar, HFCS, and processed carbs (you know them - bread, pasta, pizza, cakes, biscuits whatever). Try going "wheat" free for a few weeks.

The real problem though is how many people lose weight and then "rebound" and regain most of it, and more of their body composition is then fat. That usually happens when they stop exercising, and have tried to lose weight too quickly.

Unfortunately in most "studies", people try to lose 0.5 kg a week. That is achievable, but for many it is not sustainable. For many, it is better to reduce dietary input gradually over a period of time by switching to more healthy choices, and to increase exercise gradually. Then the hypothalamus can adjust to the changeand actually help you achieve you goal instead of over-riding your will power!

Reply


More comments: 1 2 3

Add Your Comment

Required
Required (never displayed)

Be nice. There's already enough mean people in the world.


Created / Updated: November 3, 2011

WHAT IS DIET BLOG?

We take the best of diet news and advice - and combine it with real-world application and opinion.

Find out who we are and don't hesitate to contact us, we'd love to hear from you.

"We're fatter than ever while popular media is saturated with skinny. How did it get to be so complicated?"

Privacy Policy | Sponsor Policy & Disclosure | Terms of Use | Medical Disclaimer ©2003-2011 Diet-Blog v2.0 - All Rights Reserved.